The Digital Ark: Early Modern Collections of Curiosities in England and Scotland, 1580-1700

[ Previous ][ Next ]

Pietro Gregorio Mattioli (1501 - c. 1577)

Alias Matthiolus

"Mattioli published several medical books, a long poem, and a translation of Ptolemy's Geography. But his fixation was Dioscorides; he was determined to be the world authority on Dioscorides and to bring him up-to-date in light of the new knowledge of a millenia and a half" (Isely 26-7). The result was his Commentarii Dioscorides in which he expanded his sources plant descriptions, illustrated with woodcuts. Other biography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietro_Andrea_Mattioli Authority - early modern
Linked print sources: as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Petri Andreae Matthioli Medici Senensis Commentarii, in Libros sex Pedacii Dioscoridis Anazarbei, de Materia Medica, Adjectis quàm plurimis plantarum & animalium imaginibus, eodem authore, also known as Commentarii.
as Subject of/in a document - One Hundred and One Botanists.
References in Documents:
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 13 An Stellio ex Matthiolo. Jons. Tab. 78. Perhaps the Gecko of Matthiolus. Jonston 1657a, tab. 78.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) A Great MAMMEE-STONE. Two inches and ½ long, an inch and ½ broad in the middle, flat, and somewhat sharp at both ends. Bauhinus gives the Description and Figure hereof both out of Clusius, by whom it is called Avellana Indica. 'Tis also curiously figur'd in Calceolarius: but with the same Name. And with the same, described by Matthiolus. All of them mistaking it for a Nut. Whereas in truth it is the Stone of a kind of Fruit like a great Peach, and bigger; in which there are commonly two of these Stones.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

That which Dioscorides calls Σάκχαρον; Galen, Sacchar; & Archigenes, Sal Indum; is the same thing for substance, saith Matthiolus, with that we call Sugar: saving that, whereas this is made of the Juyce expressed and boil'd; that of the Ancients, as is likely, was only the Tears; which bursting out of the Cane, as the Gums or Milks of Plants are used to do, were thereupon harden'd into a pure white Sugar. That the Sugar of the Ancients was the simple Concreted Juyce of a Cane, He well conjectures: and what is above said of the Mambu, may argue as much. But that it was the Juyce or Tears of the Sugar-Cane, he proves not. Nor, I think, could be, if, as is supposed, it was, like Salt, friable, and hard. And in affirming our Sugar to be the same for substance with that of the Ancients, he much mistakes; that being the simple Juyce of the Cane, this a compounded Thing, always mixed either with the Salt of Lime, or of Ashes; sometimes of Animals too.