The Digital Ark: Early Modern Collections of Curiosities in England and Scotland, 1580-1700

[ Previous ][ Next ]

John Wallis, Dr. (1616 - 1703)

Clergyman (Bishop of Winchester), mathematician, cryptographer and fellow of the Royal Society. Dictionary of National Biography entry: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/28572?docPos=11 Other biography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wallis Authority - early modern
Relevant locations: Title (royalty or holy order) Winchester, Hampshire
Workplace or place of business Oxford University, Oxford
Relationships: John Wallis was a friend of John Evelyn (1620-1706)
John Wallis was a member of Royal Society (-)

Linked print sources: as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - A letter from Dr. John Wallis, to one of the secretaries of the Royal Society (Dr. Robert Plot, the publisher of these transactions) concerning an antient mantle-tree in Northampton-shire; on which the date of it (for the year of our Lord 1133) is expressed by the numeral figures, which shews the great antiquity of those figures here in England.
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Two Extracts of the Journall of the Phil. Soc. of Oxford; one containing a Paper, communicated March 31, 1685, by the Reverend Dr Wallis, President of that Soc. concerning the strength of Memory when applied with due attention: the other, dated Dec. 15th, 1685, describing a large Stone Voided by way of Urine.
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - V. Part of letter of Dr. Jo. Wallis F. R. S. to the publisher, concerning the use of the numeral figures in England, in the year 1090.
References in Documents:
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) King's Alfred Jewel. Hutchinson's History of Durham. Vol. I. p. 25. note †. In the Philosophical Transactions No. 247 and 260 and in Gibson's edit of the Britannia, a curious Jewel, representing St. Cuthbert, is described, found near Athelney in Somersetshire. The portrait is enamelled on gold, drawn sitting in an episcopal chair, with the following inscription in Saxon – Thus construed: – Alfredus me jussit fabrican. Mr Wallis, speaking of this portrait, has the following remarks: “King Alfred preferred these characters to the saxon, and when he swa/y\ed the sceptre, brought them into use. This curious memorial of St. Cure Cuthbert was found in the very place of that glorious monarch's retreat and deliverance from the Danes, fortified by him in the time of war, and in the time of peace converted into a monastery.” Dr. Musgrave (who wrote a dissertation thereon), thinks this curious Cimolium an undeniable instance of the use of images coming from the Heathens into the Christian Church. Dr. Hickes has engraven it in his Thesaurus, and is of opinion, that the occasion of it was the vision of St. Cuthbert, which William of Malmsbury speaks of, appearing to him and his mother the same night, (after he had been beaten by the Danes, and retired into Athelney), and assuring him that he should be a great king. In memory whereof we may well suppose, that the image upon it is St. Cuthbert's, (to whose merit he was wont to ascribe his future successes over the Danes), and not only so, but being plainly made, on purpose to hang on a string, it is very probable that himself constantly wore it, in honour of to this his tutelar saint. – It is said to be now in the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford. – see Archaeologia, Vol. ii. p. 68.72.
MS Book of the dean of Christ Church (MacGregor, ed.) 172 Joh: Wallis. S.T.P. Geom: Prof: Savil: Oxon. John Wallis, Professor of Sacred Theology, Savillian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford.
Selections from his diary
[Excerpt from vol. 3, October 1664]

25 Came to visite my Lord Cornbery (whose father my L: H: Chancelor of England, was also now Chancelor of the University) the Vice-Chancellor, who with the Dr. Fell, Deane of Christ-Church, Warden of Queenes, the learnd Dr. Barlow, & severall heads of houses came to visite my Lord, & next day Invited him & us all to dinner:

I went to visite Mr. Boyle now here, whom I found with Dr. Wallis & Dr. Chr: Wren in the Tower at the Scholes, with an inverted Tube or Telescope observing the Discus of the Sunn for the passing of ☿ that day before the Sunn; but the Latitude was so greate, that nothing appeared: So we went to see the rarities in the Library, where the Library keepers, shewed me my name, among the Benefactors: They have a Cabinet of some Medails, & Pictures of the Muscular parts of Mans body: Thence to the new Theater, building now at an exceeding & royal Expense by the L: A: B: of Canterbury, to keepe the Acts in for the future, 'til now being in St. Maries church: The foundation being but newly laied & the whole, Design’d by that incomparable genius, & my worthy friend Dr. Chr: Wren, who shewed me the Model, not disdaining my advise in some particulars: Thence to see the Picture on the Wall over the Altar at All-Soules, being the largest piece of Fresco painting (or rather in Imitation of it, for tis in oyle [of Terpentine]) in England, & not ill design'd, by the hand of one Fuller: yet I fear it will not hold long, & seemes too full of nakeds for a Chapell: Thence to New-Coll: & the Painting of Magdalens Chapell, which is on blue Cloth in Chiaro Oscuro by one Greeneborow, being a Cœna Domini & Judgement [on] the Wall by Fuller, as is the other, somewhat varied: Next to Waddam, & the Physi[c]k Garden where were two large Locust Trees,[*]This appears to be an error for lotus or lote-trees, also called nettle-trees; the existence of at least one here in 1658 is shown by the Catalogus Horti Botanici Oxoniensis of that year; it contains nothing that can be identified as a locust-tree. In Sylva Evelyn mentions the lotus (ed. 1664, p. 58); longer notice in later editions) but not the locust (Diary, ed. de Beer, vol. 3, p. 386, n. 5) & as many Platana[*]They are not mentioned in the Catalogus of 1658. The plane is sometimes said to have been introduced by Bacon; it was evidently still very rare; Evelyn was given a specimen by Sir George Croke to whom he attributes its successful introduction: see successive notices in Sylva, 1664, p. 58. (Diary, ed. de Beer, vol. 3, p. 386, n. 6), & some rare Plants under the Culture of old Bobart.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

Architecture. A Model of a Geometrick FLAT FLOOR. Given by the forementioned Person. Contrived and delineated (a) by Dr. J. Wallis Professor of Geometry at Oxford. Who was pleas'd to give me the following Account, as an Abstract of that he hath formerly published hereof. (a) (a) See his Book De Motu, Cap. 6. Prop. 10. Fig. 243.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669) Two Extracts of the Journall of the Phil. Soc. of Oxford; one containing a Paper, communicated March 31, 1685, by the Reverend Dr Wallis, President of that Soc. concerning the strength of Memory when applied with due attention: the other, dated Dec. 15th, 1685, describing a large Stone Voided by way of Urine.
Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)
VI. Part of a Letter from Mr. Halley at Chester, October 26th, 1696. giving an Account of an Animal resembling a Whelp voided per Anum, by a Male Greyhound, and of a Roman Altar found there, &c.

THEThe Account the Society had from Dr. Wallis about a Year since of a Greyhound Dog, that voided an Animal, resembling a Whelp per anum, as strange and incredible as it may seem, is yet here stedfastly believed; and the Creature was kept for some time in Spirit of Wine, having lived for some short time after it came into the World: and it was seen alive by Mr. Roberts of the Society, then in Chester. They say it exactly resembled a Greyhound-Whelp, and had on its side a large spot, in the same place as the Dog it proceeded from, had such another; and that with it was voided a whitish mucuous Matter, so that the People here will not permit me to question the truth thereof. Mr. Roberts who saw it first, can best judge what Credit this uncouth Story Merits. But this is certain, That it cost the Dog his Life, to gratifie the Curiosity of some Gentlemen here, who Dissected him, but were disappointed of their Expectations. For my own part, as I am determined nihil temere credere; so on the other hand, as I dare not pretend to limit the Powers of Nature, I suspend my Opinion, laying only before you what credible Witnesses do assert.

I this Morning got a sight of an Altar-piece, dug up here about three Years since, and took the Inscription thereof which is pretty entire, but roughly cut in the Stone of the place, which is soft and ( 317 ) moldring, nor capable of long continuance when it is exposed to the Air: It has the following Inscription.

PRO. SAL. DOMIN .... IM N N INVI CTISSIMORVM AVGG. GENIOLOCI FLAVIVS LONG—— I suppose VS there not being room for INVS TRIB. MIL. LEGXX. LONGINUS FLA VIVS DOMO SAMOSATA  V .   S.

By the Title of Domini nostri given to the Emperors, it appears, that this Inscription was of the Bas Empire, not before Dioclesian, nor yet so late as Theodorus, it being Pagan. The Stone it self is about Thirty two Inches high, Sixteen in breadth, and Nine thick; On the one end is Engraven, not very curiously, the Resemblance of a Genius, holding a Cornu Copia; on the other is a Flower-pot somewhat better performed, but a little endamaged by the softness of the Stone. The backside opposite to the Inscription, is adorned with a pretty sort of Feuillage, designed to fill up the vacant space. On the top in a pretty deep Cavity, is a full Face of a Man, almost such as they Paint the Sun or Full Moon withal, with a Cap upon his Head, of which as yet I cannot comprehend the Design; I submit it to the Disquisition of the Society; and if it be thought requisite, I will more particularly inspect and describe this Stone, which is in the Custody of one Mr. Prescot here, a great lover of Antiquity, and who has several curiosities by him, which I am promised to peruse.

( 318 )

The Stone of this place, which is soft, reddish, grit, and very friable, with shining Particles intermixt, is very apt to decay with the Weather, so that all Old Buildings are very much defaced thereby, and the Walls which are Built thereof, are so frequently out of Repair, that they have Officers on purpose, whom they call Murengers, who do gradually refit them, where they are most worn out; in some places the Stone is in a manner moulded away like Sammel Bricks in a Wall, leaving the Mortar standing. In these Stones, and the Quarries from whence they came., I have diligently sought for Shells, or other Animal Substances, such as are often found in other palces, but hitherto have found no such things: But the Stone is generally intersperst with Pebbles and small Flints, which, as the stone decays, do discover themsevles within it, as if they had been lodged in the Sand, whereof the Stone consists before its Induration.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)

SIXSix Months ago I sent to Dr. Lister a large Account of the Texture and Figure of an old Roman Shield of the Parma Kind, that I had then newly procured; I have since got another Curiosity relating to their Plasticks, 'tis part of the Bottom (which consisted of several such Pieces for the Conveniency of Baking) of an old Roman Coffin, that was lately dug up in their Burying-Place out of Boutham-Bar at York, (whence I had the Bricks and Urns mentioned in the last November Transactions) 'tis of the Red Clay but not so fine as the Urns, having a greater Quantity of course Sand wrought in with the Clay; as to the Form (which is entire as it was at first moulded) 'tis Fourteen Inches and an half long, and (311) about Eleven broad at the narrower End, and nigh Twelve and an half at the broader; this was the lowest part, for the Feet and the rest were proportionably broader till it came to the Shoulders; 'tis an Inch thick besides the Ledges, which are One broad and Two thick, and extend from the bottom of either side to within Three Inches of the top, where 'tis wholly flat, and somewhat thinner for the next to lye upon it, which several Parts were thus joyn'd together by some Pin, I presume, for at the end of each Tile is a Hole that wou'd receive a common Slate-Pin, these Edges are wrought a little hollow, to receive the Sides, I suppose, and at the Feet are Two contrary Notches to fasten the End-piece, this Bottom I should conclude to have consisted strictly of Eight such Parts, from a like Character 8 imprest upon the Clay by the Sandapilarius's Finger before its Baking, but that I somewhat doubt whether Numeral Figures be of that Antiquity in these European Parts, tho' I see no reason to conclude that because the Romans used the Numeral Letters upon their more durable Monuments, that they were utterly Strangers to these Figures, which (notwithstanding the common Opinion of their Novelty here) the learned Dr. Wallis thinks as old at least, as the Times of Hermannus Contractus, An. Dom 1050. and produces an unexceptionable Testimony of their Use here in England An. 1133. Philosoph. Transact. Numb. 154.) I got also some Scars of broken Urns, dug up in Mr. Giles's Garden, which are of the finest blew Clay I have seen, with which was found a Roman Shuttle, about Three Inches and an half long, but not one broad in the very middle, the hollow for the Licium being but one fourth of an Inch in the broadest Place, shews that it was either for Silk or very fine Linnen, perhaps their Asbestinum or Incombustible Winding-Sheets. I have also lately procur'd a Roman Pottle from (312) Aldbrough, which is of the Red Clay, but much courser than the York Urns: I was well pleased to find it whole, that I might observe the difference betwixt their Congius (of which I take this to be strictly the half) and our Gallon, and this comes the nighest Mr. Graves's Computation, containing Three Pints and an half the Winchester Measure.

Thoresby, Musaeum Thoresbyanum (1713)

There was digged up at the same Place a Sort of Coffin made of Clay, I have by me Part of the Bottom, which (for the Conveniency of baking, I presume) was divided into several such Parts; this is entire as first molded by the Romans, is 14 ½ Inches long, and almost 11 broad at the narrower End, and nigh 12 ½ at the broader: This was the lowest Part for the Feet, the rest were proportionably broader to the Shoulder; it is an Inch thick besides the Ledges, which are two in Thickness, and one in Breadth, and extend from the narrower End to within three Inches of the broader, where it is flat from Edge to Edge, and somewhat thinner for the next to ly upon it. Which several Parts seem to have been joined together by a Pin; for at the End of each Tile is a Hole that would receive a common Slate-Pin, the Ledges are wrought a little Hollow, to receive the Sides, I presume; and at the Feet are two contrary Notches to fasten the End-piece. This Bottom I should conclude to have consisted strictly of eight such Parts, from a like Character 8 impress'd upon the Clay by the Sandapilarius's Finger, before its baking, but that I doubt numeral Figures cannot plead that Antiquity in these European Parts; though it appears by a Letter of Dr. Wallis's (Phil. Trans. N° 266) that they were used in England, An. 1090. Here are also Fragments of such a Coffin found at Burgdunum.