The Digital Ark: Early Modern Collections of Curiosities in England and Scotland, 1580-1700

[ Previous ][ Next ]

Jan Jonston (1603 - 1675)

Alias John Johnston
Alias Joannes Jonstonus (Alias)

Polish naturalist, scholar and physician, descended from Scottish nobility. His father emigrated from Scotland. Other biography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jonston Relevant locations: Educated at Cambridge University, Cambridge
Educated at University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews
Lived at or near Poland, Europe
Member of parliament for Scotland, Europe
Residence at Scotland, Europe
Linked print sources: as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiæ naturalis de exanguibus aquaticis libri IV. Cum figuris æneis. Joannes Jonstonus Med. D. concinnavit.
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - [Historiæ naturalis de quadrupetibus [sic] (... avibus, ... piscibus et cetis, exanguibus aquaticis, ... insectis, serpentibus ...) libri. MS. notes.].
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiæ naturalis de quadrupetibus [sic] (... avibus, ... piscibus et cetis, exanguibus aquaticis, ... insectis, serpentibus ...) libri. MS. notes.
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiae naturalis de avibus libri VI ....
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiae naturalis de insectis. Libri. III.: de serpentibus et draconib[us] Libri II. Cum aeneis figuris .
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiae naturalis de piscibus et cetis libri V cum aeneis figuris Iohannes Ionstonus Med. Doctor concin[n]auit .
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiae naturalis de serpentibus libri II.
References in Documents:
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 6 Nautilus argenteus minor sed fortassis ejusdem. speciei. An Cochlea margaretifera vulgo dicta Rond. p.97? Nautilus alter, cochlea margaritifera Bellonij Jonst. Smaller, silver Nautilus, but perhaps of the same species. Could it be the Cochlea margaretifera, as it is commonly called, of Rondelet 1555, p. 97. The other Nautilus, the Cochlea margaritifera of Belon and Jonston.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 3 Auris marina eadem cum balanis Gigantis Jonst. adnatis. Marine Auris of the same kind as the giant native Balanus of Jonston.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 4 Auris marina minor s. Anglicana. Auris marina Rond. Jonst. Aura marina Mosch. p. 205. Orecchia marina Buon. Cl. 1. n. 10 & 11. Smaller marine Auris or English Auris; to some, the Auris marina of Rondelet and Jonston; the Aura marina of Moscardo 1656, p. 205; the Orecchia marina of Buonanni 1684, class 1, nos. 10 & 11.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 15 Pecten monotis asper colore albo, cum tuberculis rubris corallinis adnatis. Pecten asper Jonst. Rough Pecten monotis, white in colour, with red tubercle like coralline; the rough Pecten of Johnston.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 1 Musculus Aldr. Jonst. Buon. Cl. 2. n. 30. Mussel. The Musculus of Aldrovandi and Jonston; Buonanni 1684, class 2 no. 30.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 2 Pinna Perna Rond. Jonst. The Pinna Perna of Rondelet and Jonston.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 1 Solen Græcorũm, Unguis Latinorũm Buon. Cl. 2. n. 57. solen mas Rond. Jonst. The Greek Solen and the Latin Unguis: see Buonanni 1684, class 2 no. 57. The Solen major of Rondelet and Jonston.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 13 Patella profundiuscule striata, albida, vertice subcæruleo. Patella Aldr. Jonst. Buon. Cl. 1. n. 3. Patella with quite deep striations, white in colour with a bluish spire. The Patella of Aldrovandi and Jonston; Buonanni 1684 class 1 no. 3.
Objects mentioned in correspondence
Dr. Browne to Dr. Merritt [MS SLOAN. 1830] Aug. 18, 1668. Honored Sir,

I received your courteous letter, and am sorry some diversions have so long delayed this my second unto you. You are very exact in the account of the fungi. I have met with two, which I have not found in any author; of which I have sent you a rude draught inclosed. The first, an elegant fungus ligneru, found in a hollow sallow. I have one of them by me, but, without a very good opportunity, dare not send it, fearing it should be broken. Unto some it seemed to resemble some noble or princely ornament of the head, and so might be called fungru regius; unto others, a turret, top of a cupola, or lantern of a building; and so might be named fungus pterygoides, pinnacularis, or lanterniformis. You may name it as you please. The second, fungru ligneus teres antliarum, or fungus ligularis longissimru, consisting or made of many woody strings, about the bigness of round points or laces; some above half a yard long, shooting in a bushy form from the trees, which serve under ground for pumps. I have observed divers, especially in Norwich, where wells are sunk deep for pumps.

The fungus phalloides I found not far from Norwich, large and very fetid, answering the description of Hadrianus Junius. I have a part of one dried still by me.

Fungus rotundus major I have found about ten inches in diameter, and [have] half a one dried by me.

Another small paper contains the side draughts of fibulæ marinæ pellucidæ, or sea buttons, a kind of squalder; and referring to urtica marina, which I have observed in great numbers by Yarmouth, after a flood and easterly winds. They resemble the pure crystal buttons, chamfered or welted on the sides, with two small holes at the ends. They cannot be sent; for the included water, or thin jelly, soon runneth from them.

396 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. [1668.

Urtica marina minor Johnstoni, I have often found on this coast. Physsalus I have found also. I have one dried, but it hath lost its shape and colour. Galei and caniculæ are often found. I have a fish hanging up in my yard, of two yards long, taken among the herrings at Yarmouth, which is the canis carcharius alius Johnstoni, table vi, fig. 6. Lupus marinus, you mention, upon a handsome experiment, but I find it not in the catalogue. This lupus marinus or lycostomus, is often taken by our seamen which fish for cod. I have had divers brought me. They hang up in many houses in Yarmouth. Trutta marina is taken with us. A better dish than the river trout, but of the same bigness. Loligo sepia, a cuttle; page 191 of your Pinax. I conceive, worthy sir, it were best to put them in two distinct lines, as distinct species of the molles. The loligo, calamare, or sleve, I have also found cast upon the sea-shore; and some have been brought me by fishermen, of about twenty pounds weight. Among the fishes of our Norwich river, we scarce reckon salmon, yet some are yearly taken; but all taken in the river or on the coast have the end of the lower jaw very much hooked, which enters a great way into the upper jaw, like a socket. You may find the same, though not in figure, if you please to read Johnston's folio, 101. I am not satisfied with the conceit of some authors, that there is a difference of male and female; for all ours are thus formed. The fish is thicker than ordinary salmon, and very much and more largely spotted. Whether not rather Boccard gallorus, or Auchorago Scaligeri. I have both draughts, and the head of one dried; either of which you may command. Scyllarus, or cancellus in turbine, it is probable you have. Have you cancellus in nerite, a small testaceous found upon this coast? Have you mullus ruber asper?—Piscis octangularis Bivormii?—Vermes marini, larger than earth-worms, digged out of the sea-sand, about two feet deep, and at an In June, 1827, I knew of two salmon-trout in our Overstrand mackarel nets.—G. 1668.] MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. 397 ebb water, for bait? They are discovered by a little hole or sinking of the sand at the top about them.

Have you that handsome coloured jay, answering the description of garrulus argentoratensis, and may be called the parrot-jay? I have one that was killed upon a tree about five years ago.

Have you a May chit, a small dark grey bird, about the bigness of a stint, which cometh about May, and stayeth but a month; a bird of exceeding fatness, and accounted a dainty dish? They are plentifully taken in Marshland, and about Wisbeech.

Have you a caprimulgus, or dorhawk; a bird as a pigeon, with a wide throat bill, as little as a titmouse, white feathers in the tail, and paned like a hawk? Succinum rarò occurrit, p. 219 of yours. Not so rarely on the coast of Norfolk. It is usually found in small pieces; sometimes in pieces of a pound weight. I have one by me, fat and tare, of ten ounces weight; yet more often I have found it in handsome pieces of twelve ounces in weight.

Objects mentioned in correspondence Urtica marina minor Johnstoni
Objects mentioned in correspondence Galei and caniculæ are often found. I have a fish hanging up in my yard, of two yards long, taken among the herrings at Yarmouth, which is the canis carcharius alius Johnstoni, table vi, fig. 6.
Objects mentioned in correspondence

I received your courteous letter; and with all respects I now again salute you. The mola piscis is almost yearly taken on our coast. This last year one was taken of about two hundred pounds weight. Divers of them I have opened; and have found many lice sticking close unto their gills, whereof I send you some. In your Pinax I find onocrotalus, or pelican; whether you mean those at St. James's, or others brought over, or such as have been taken or killed here, I know not. I have one hung up in my house, which was shot in a fen ten miles off, about 7 Bait for codling.-G. 8 The Garrulous Roller. 9 Not uncommon; I had a young one brought me a few years ago.-G. 1 It is becoming scarce at Cromer. The fat amber most commonly occurs.-G. 398 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. [1668. four years ago; and because it was so rare, some conjectured it might be one of those which belonged unto the king, and flew away. Ciconia, rarò huc adeolat. I have seen two in a watery marsh, eight miles off; another shot, whose case is yet to be seen. Vitulus marinus. In tractibus borealibus et Scotia. No rarity upon the coast of Norfolk. At low water I have known them taken asleep under the cliffs. Divers have been brought to me. Our seal is different from the Mediterranean seal; as having a rounder head, a shorter and stronger body. Rana piscatrix. I have often known taken on our coast; and some very large. Xiphias, or gladius piscis, or sword-fish, we have in our seas. I have the head of one which was taken not long ago, entangled in the herring-nets. The sword about two feet in length. Among the whales you may very well put in the spermacetus, or that remarkably peculiar whale which so aboundeth in spermaceti. About twelve years ago we had one cast up on our shore, near Wells, which I described in a peculiar chapter in the last edition of my "Pseudodoxia Epidemica;" and another was, divers years before, cast up at Hunstanton; both whose heads are yet to be seen. Ophidion, or, at least, ophidion nostras, commonly called a sting-fish, having a small prickly fin running all along the back, and another a good way on the belly, with little black spots at the bottom ofthe back fin. If the fishermen's hands be touched or scratched with this venomous fish, they grow painful and swell. The figure hereof I send you in colours. They are common about Cromer. See Schoneveldeus, "De Ophidia." Piscis octogoniru, or octangularis, answering the description of Cataphractus Schonevelde; only his is described with the fins spread; and when it was fresh taken, and a large one. However, this may be nostras, I send you one; but I have seen much larger, which fishermen have brought me. 2 The Stork. 3 Very rarly seen at Cromer. I think they are met with on sandbanks near Hunstanton.-G 4 Frog-fish 1668.] MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. 399 Physsalus. I send one which hath been long opened and shrunk and lost the colour. When I took it upon the seashore, it was full and plump, answering the figure and description of Rondeletius. There is also a like figure at the end of Muffetus. I have kept them alive; but observed no motion, except of contraction and dilatation. When it is fresh, the prickles or bristles are of a brisk green and amethist colour. Some call it a sea-mouse. Our mullet is white and imberbis; but we have also a mullus barbatus ruber miniaceus, or cinnaberinus; somewhat rough, and but dry meat. There is of them major and minor, resembling the figures in Johnstonus, tab. xvii, Rotbart. Of the acus marinus, or needle fishes, I have observed three sorts. The acus Aristotelis, called here an addercock; acus major, or garfish, with a green verdigrease back-bone; the other, saurus acui similis. Acus sauroides, or sauriformis, as it may be called; much answering the description of saurus Rondeletii. In the hinder part much resembling a mackerell. Opening one, I found not the back-bone green. Johnstonus writes nearest to it, in his Acus Minor. I send you the head of one dried; but the bill is broken. I have the whole draught in picture. This kind is much more near than the other, which are common, and is a rounder fish. Vermes marini are large worms found two feet deep in the sea-sands, and are digged out at the ebb for bait. The avicula Maialis, or May chit; is a little dark grey bird, somewhat bigger than a stint, which cometh in May, or the latter end of April, and stayeth about a month. A marsh bird, the legs and feet black, without heel; the bill black, about three quarters of an inch long. They grow very fat, and are accounted a dainty dish. A dorhawk, a bird not full so big as a pigeon, somewhat of a woodcock colour, and paned somewhat like a hawk, with a bill not much bigger than that of a titmouse, and a very wide throat; known by the name of a dorhawk, or preyer upon beetles, as though it were some kind of accipiter muscarius. In brief, this accipiter cantharophagus, or dorhawk, is avis 5 I have seen a sea-mouae taken out of a cod-fish, but thev are not common at Cromer. -G. 400 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. [1668. rostratula gutturosa, quasi coaxans, scarabæis vescens, sub vesperam volans, ovum speciosissimum excludens. I have had many of them; and am sorry I have not one to send you. I spoke to a friend to shoot one; but I doubt they are gone over. Of the upupas, divers have been brought me; and some I have observed in these parts, as I travelled about. The aquila Gesneri I sent alive to Dr. Scarburg, who told me it was kept in the colledge. It was brought me out of Ireland. I kept it two years in my house. I am sorry I have only one feather of it to send you. A shoeing-horn or barker, from the figure of the bill and barking note; a long made bird, of white and blackish colour; fin-footed; a marsh-bird; and not rare some times of the year in Marshland. It may upon view be called, recurvirostra nostras, or avoseta; much resembling the avosetæ species in Johnstonus, tab. 5. I send you the head in picture. Four curlews I have kept in large cages. They have a pretty shrill note; not hard to be got in some parts of Norfolk. Have you the scorpius marinus Schoneveldei? Have you put in the musca tuliparum muscata? That bird which I said much answered the description of garrulus argentoratensis, I send you. It was shot on a tree ten miles off, four years ago. It may well be called the parrot jay, or garrulus psittacoides speciosus. The colours are much faded. If you have it before, I should be content to have it again; otherwise you may please to keep it. Garrulus Bohemicus probably you have. A pretty handsome bird, with the fine cinnabrian tips of the wings. Some which I have seen have the tail tipt with yellow, which is not in their description. I have also sent you urtica mas, which I lately gathered at Golston, by Yarmouth, where I found it to grow also twenty- five years ago. Of the stella marina testacea, which I sent you, I do not find the figure in any book. I send you a few flies, which, some unhealthful years, come about the first part of September. I have observed them so numerous upon plashes in the marshes and marish ditches, 6 The Golden Eagle. 8 The Waxen Chatterer. 7 The Garrulous Roller. 9 Marshy. 1668.] MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE. 401 that, in a small compass, it were no hard matter to gather a peck of them. I brought some; what my box would hold; but the greatest part are scattered, lost, or given away. For memory's sake, I wrote on my box muscæ palustres autumnales.

Objects mentioned in correspondence I send you the draught of a fish taken some times in our seas. Pray compare it with draco minor Johnstoni. This draught was taken from the fish dried, and so the prickly fins less discernible.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The MUSK DEER. Capreolus Moschi. Gesner reckoning up the Names, tells us, That the English call him a Musk Cat. But is better at other Languages. He breeds in China, and the East Indies. Not ill pictur'd in Calceolarius's Musæum. That in Kircher's China Illustrata faulty as to the Snout and Feet. That of Johnston absurd. Almost every where worse describ'd. That he is a two-horn'd Animal, says Aldrovandus, all agree, except Simeon Sethi, who saith he hath but one. Neither of which is true. The Description likewise given by Scaliger, and out of him by Chiocco in Calceolarius's Musæum is false, and very defective. The best I find is amongst the German Transactions. To which I would have refer'd the Reader, but that comparing it with That I had drawn up before I met with it, I see some differences.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The HORNES of an Indian Roe-Buck; which the people of Brasile call Cuguacu-apara. See the Description of the Animal in Marggrarius. His Picture in Johnston; but under the name of the Capreolus Marinus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HORNES of a DOG-GOAT. I find them inscribed, The hornes of a Dog. Johnston giveth the figure of the Animal, without any Description. According to that figure, he is headed like a Dog, and of the bigness of a Tumbler. But footed, and horned like a Goat. To whose also the hornes here preserved are like in colour, and somewhat near in shape: but nothing near so big; being not much above two inches long. Not only the hornes themselves, but also the bones whereon they stand, are hollow to the top. They were sent from a certain Kingdom near China.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HORNES of a HARE; so I find them inscribed. Although it is probable, that they are the hornes of a small kind of German Deer. Yet Wormius saith, There are horned-Hares in Saxony. See also Gesner of the same. Johnston gives the Picture, without a Descripton. This pair, once belonged to the Prince Elector of Saxony.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HORNES of a MUSCOVY-Ram. I meet no where with the Description of the Animal, or these Hornes. He seemeth to be of kin to the Hircus Cotilardicus, which Johnston hath pictur'd. These hornes are black: and somewhat wrinkled. Consist of four Branches: The two greater whereof are a foot long, and as thick as an ordinary Rams, very strait, standing in the form of the letter V, or like the legs of a pair of Compasses, and a little writhen. The two lesser are seven inches long, not so thick, winding downward, and inward one towards another, in the form of two half Moons. The points of all four very blunt.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The HORNES of the BUNCH-BAK'D BULL. Cornua Bisontis. This pair belongeth to that Species, which hath a great Maine. These, contrary to the former, stand wide, and especial upwards, their Tips being ½ an Eln distant. See the Description of the Animal in Aldrovandus, his Picture in Johnston. He is swifter than any other Bull, and untameable. He breeds in Lithuania. To the hornes is joyn'd the fore-part of the skull, together with the skin, which is very thick and tough. The skin of any Bulls Forehead, either for its toughness, or other cause, is the only part of the Hyde made use of by Horners, whereupon they shave their Hornes (which they take out of a Tub of warm water by them) to fit them for Lamphorns.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The CHAMÆLEON. By Wormius well described. Johnston's Figure, especially as to the feet, very false. A most curious one in Calceolarius. As also in Besler, saving that his eyes are drawn somewhat too little. Of the skin it may be noted, that 'tis every where rough, as it were, with little round blisters or knobs; on his Head and Back, greater; on his Legs, Sides and Belly, lesser; of the bigness of Silkworms Eggs. As also, that his hinder Feet are thicker than the fore-Feet: and the Heels or hinder Toes as long again, as the other; whereas in the fore-Feet, they are all of a length. The shape of his hinder Feet is therefore the better fitted to assist him in the climbing of Trees; the Heels being like strong Leavers to hoist him up. And the make of his Skin, for the changeableness of his Colours; which seems to depend on the falling or swelling of the said Knobs; whereby the light, receiving different Reflections, produceth different Colours. Of his Colours, saith Scaliger, (b) (b) Exercit. 196. Sect. 4. from the Observation of Joh. Landius, it is not so properly said, that they are chang'd, but only the several Species highten'd or deepen'd. He hath a long Tail, as a Lizard, but slenderer: which, (c) (c) Panarolus. as he descends from a Tree, he laps round about the Boughs, to keep himself from falling. His Feet also are all made where with to take fast hold.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The BUGELUGEY. Of kin to the former. Aldrovandus and Johnston give only his Figure, with the Name of Lacertus Indicus. He is distinguished from other Lizards, chiefly, by the Scales on his Belly, which, like those of a Crocodile, are very great; sc. five or six times bigger than those on his back. It was brought from Africa. This Lizard, saith Wormius, moveth his upper Jaw, as the Crocodile. Which, in what sense it is false and absurd, I have above shew'd.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SAW-FISH. Pristis. Johnston hath given a good figure (e) (e) Tab. 4. N. 1. hereof, but without either Name or Description. And that of Wormius is defective, and in some particulars, out.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HEAD of the TUCK-FISH. Of the Sword-fish kind, but a different Species from the former. Whether it be any where describ'd, seems doubtful. The hinder parts of the Head are here broken off. The Snout is not so flat as in the Rapier-fish, but thicker and rounder, more like a Tuck, from whence I take leave to name it. 'Tis half a yard long; near the Head, two inches over; about the middle, one. Not with a flat point, but one perfectly round. The upper part hereof is smooth, the nether rough, the smooth and rough parts continu'd obliquely from the Point to the Root. Both the Chaps are also rough in the same manner, in the place of the Teeth, which this Fish hath not. The nether Chap hath also a different shape from that of the Rapier-Fish: this being not above four inches over, that half a foot; yet both are a foot long. It is composed of two Bones, so joyned together, for the space only of an inch and half, as to make a sharp point.

Marggravius and Piso (and out of these Johnston) describe an American-Fish by the name of GUEBUCU, of kin to this, the Head whereof is here describ'd. But cannot be the same, unless both the Pictures which they give, and Marggravius's Description (who particularly saith, That the Snout is sixteen inches long, the nether Chap, ten) be false. For in this Head, the nether Chap is broader, and comparatively not near so long.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The VIVIPAROUS EEL-POUT. Mustela marina vivipara. (the Male, Lupus marinus Schonfeldii.) 'Tis well pictur'd by Adam Oleareus, (a) (a) Tab. 27. f. 2. who calls it a Sea-Wolf (Ein See-Wolf). As also by Johnston; but not described. But in Gesner's Paralypomena 'tis both figur'd and described by Ge. Fabritius under the Name of Klipfisch (i. e. Rock-Fish,) so called by the people near the Baltick (where he breeds.) Fabritius is particular only as to the Teeth, and is also mistaken in some things. I shall therefore add the Description I drew up before I met with his.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SCATE, or Angel-Fish. Squatina, sive Angelus Marinus. The figure in Johnston is tollerable. But the Description very short and imperfect. That of Rondeletius is better, yet not full. And either the Fish he describes is a different Species, or his Description of the Teeth is not true.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The BRASILIAN FROG-FISH. Rana Piscatrix minor. In Brasile, GUACUACUYA. The figure which Johnston gives is tolerable; but his Description very defective. The length of this is eight inches. His Mouth open makes a Circle ¼ of an inch over. His Lips, in the usual place of Teeth, are rough; as also is his Tongue. He hath a black Horn on his Forehead, stooped forwards, round, an inch and ½ long, one third over at the bottom, pointed, and having little Spikes round about it. What Johnston means by the Cuteus Nervus, appears not. At the top of his Head, just under the Horn, stand his Eyes a ¼ of an inch over, and (here) no more distant. The Nostrils a little before the Horn.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SHIPHALTER. Echeneis. Remora. Johnston hath given an indifferent figure of it. But I meet with no tolerable Description any where.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SEA-PORCUPINE. Histrix Piscis. Johnston hath figur'd it ( Tab. 45.) but not well. Neither do I find any tolerable Description of it.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The FROG-GLOB-FISH. Orbis Batrachoides. Figur'd by Johnston under the Title of Gestachelt meer Taube, Tab. 24. But I find it not described to any purpose.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HORNED CONEY-FISH. Piscis triangularis cornutus. Johnston hath figur'd it. (a) (a) Tab. 45. But without either Description or Name. It differs from the fish last described chiefly by its Horns, which he hath upon the top of his Forehead, ½ an inch long, near an inch about the bottom, and pointed; almost like an Horses Ears when he pricks them forward. His Teeth are also smaller, his Mouth lesser, and more naked. His Belly narrower, and so his sides more compressed. The Tail-Fin longer. And the Oval Crust on the Tail, not above but beneath.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The FILE-FISH. CAPRISCUS. It was sent from the Bermudas. Curiously pictur'd and described by Salvian. (a) (a) Hist. 71. I call it the File-Fish, from the likeness which the foremost Bone upon his Back hath to a file. There are three of them: which, saith Salvian, he raises and depresses at his pleasure; yet so, as not one alone, but altogether. And although you press the foremost, and greatest never so hard, it will not stir: but if you depress the last and least of all never so softly, the other two immediately fall down with it: just as when a Cross-Bow is let off by pulling down the Tricker. For which reason also the fish is called, at Rome, Pesce Balestra.

Another thing peculiar to this fish is, that his Scales (as Salvian calls them) are separated by cancellated lines, or Lattice-wise. I add, and that they are all incrustated, and rough-cast with little round knobs. So that the cover of this fish, is near a kin to that of the Square-Fish; that being only one entire Crust, this divided into many little ones.

It may be noted, That where Salvian describeth this fish to be compressum & latum, atq; fere orbicularem, he hath not properly expressed his shape. For he is not Broad, but Tall; and much nearer to a Rhombus or Diamondsquare.

This fish seems to be the same which the People of Brasile call GUAPERUA; described and pictur'd by Marggravius and Piso, and out of them by Johnston. (b) (b) Tab. 34.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SQUARE ACARAUNA; by Mariners, The Old Wife. It hath some marks of kindred with the tall Acarauna, described and pictur'd in Marggravius and Piso. But hath also divers others of distinction from it; as the different position of the Spurs, the different shape both of Head, Body and Tail, &c. as may be observed by comparing the Descriptions and Figures of both together. The tall Acarauna is figured also by Johnston, (a) (a) Tab. 32. out of Marggravius; but without any Inscription of Number or Title.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SWALLOW-FISH. So called from the length of his Gill-Fins, which reach to the end of his Tail, like a pair of very long Wings. By some, the Flying-Herring, from a likeness in the shape of their Body. Perhaps Rondeletius's Mugilis Alatus. But by Salvian called Hirundo, by whom it is well described. (a) (a) Histor. 62. That Line (saith he) which in other fishes goes either from the Head or Branchiæ by the sides to the Tail; here runs from the Belly-Fins along the Belly to the Tail. Johnston also describes it out of Aldrovandus, but omits the just number of seven Fins. In the figure also which he gives, the Belly-Fins are wanting. And the Orbits of the Eyes, which are extraordinary great, he representeth little.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

Another KITE-FISH of the same Species. Figur'd by Johnston, Tab. 17. N. 9.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The MAILED-FISH. Cataphractus Schonveldii. It was brought from Guiny. But is also often taken in the Mouth of the Elb. It is well described by the Author of the Name. And by Johnston well figur'd, Tab. 46. But in Tab. 24. but scurvily, unless it be another Species. It is a small fish about five or six inches long, with a broad squat head, and thence taper'd to the end of the Tail. His Scales are as it were doubled, by which he becomes of an angular figure, with about eight Angles before, and six behind. His Nose-end armed with two Prickles standing together in a semilunar figure; supposed to be venemous.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) A STAR-FISH with TWELVE RAYS; by some called Sun-Fish. 'Twas taken in the British-Sea. The Basis of each Ray is much slenderer than by the figure in Johnston is represented. Neither is it shag'd only on the edges, as in the same figure, but all over.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The FROG-WILK. Murex Coracoides. Described and pictur'd by Johnston out of others. As are also most of those that follow, which are only named. It hath three Appendices on each side, like fingers or feet, and one at the end.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The EVEN OVAL LIMPET. See the figure hereof in Johnston. That part which may be called the Navle, stands a little above the convexity of the shell. The Seat of the Animal is shaped so, as in some sort to resemble the Stag-Beetle. The edges thereof curiously angul'd, particolour'd white and bay. The edge of the shell is perfectly Oval, and the inner Margin of a pale blew. Here are two fair Ones of this sort, about three inches long.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

Another sort of WILD-BEE, which breeds in the stocks of old Willows. Curious to observe. They first bore a Canale in the Stock, which, for more warmth, they furnish afterwards with Hangings, made of Rose-Leaves, so rowled up, as to be contiguous round about to the sides of the Canale. And to finish their Work, divide the whole in to several Rooms or Nests, with round pieces of the same leaves. Hereof see in the Philos. Trans. (a) (a) Num. 65. the Obser vations of Dr. Edm. King; whereto some others are added by Mr. Willughby, and explained by Figures.

Some parts of the NEST of another WILD-BEE. Not much unlike the first of those not inelegant figures, which Johnston gives under the Name of WESPENSTOCK.

The under or hinder Wings of a Bee, are the least; that they may not incommode his flight. (a) (a) Mouf. de Insect. cap. 1. The Honey-Bag, is the Stomach, which they always fill to satisfie, and to spare; vomiting up the greater part of the Honey, to be kept against Winter. A curious Description and Figure of the Sting, see in Mr. Hook's Micrography. In windy Weather, Bees often hold a little stone in their hinder Feet; which serves as a Ballast to make them sail through the Air more steadily. (b) (b) Ibid. The History of Bees, the best that Aristotle hath given us, (c) (c) Hist. An. lib. 9. c. 40. of any one Animal. Of their Polity, Generation, Conservation, Diseases, and Use; see also Moufet, Butler, and a late Treatise of Mr. Rusden. All that Authors speak of the Spontaneous Generation of Bees, is fabulous. The ashes of Bees are put into most Compositions for breeding of Hair.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

A WASPES-NEST. Vespetum. Given by Sir Jonas Moore, who received it from New-England. See the Figure of one in Johnston. 'Tis above a foot high, and near a foot over. Composed of a great number of little Cells, as in the Wild-Bees Nest, and encompassed with a Cover of the same stuff. All wrought about the Branch of a Tree.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The Great BULL-CHAFER. Taurus volans maximus. Johnston out of Marggravius in some sort describes four Species of Bull-Chafers, of which, as I take it, this is one. I meet also with the Picture of it in Olearius. (c) (c) Tab. 16. Fig. 2. He hath three Horns. The first is only the Snout produced and bended upward, and is therefore moveable with the Head. In length, according to the figure in Olearius (for it is here broken off) about an inch and ½ forked at the end, and with one upper branch a little before the Eyes. The Head very little. Upon his Shoulders he hath two immovable or unjoynted Horns, about ¾ of an inch long, ¼ of an inch over at the Base, directed forward, and with their points inward, like a Bulls-Horns. From the end of his Snout or fore-Horn to the end of his Tail he is about five inches long, over his Back above two and a ¼; the bigest of Insects yet known. His fore-Feet are armed with Spikes, as so many Claws; wherewith, 'tis likely he digs himself Buries. Of his Wings it is Observable, That at their utmost Joynt, they are laped up, or doubled inward towards the Head, and so kept safe under the Wing-Covers; being, when out at their full length, almost twice as long as the hinder Body or Section of the Animal. The like is observable of the Wings of some other Beetles. His Horns, Legs, Back and Wing-Covers are all black; his Belly brown.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)

3. A not ordinary sangui-suga or Leech. found sticking fast in the fish called Xiphias or Sword-fish, slightly mention'd by Gesner in his book de Aquatilibus, and Johnston in his book de Piscibus. Our presenter gives it the name of Hirudo or Acus caudâ utrinque pennatâ, because of its working it self into the flesh, and sucking the blood of the said Fish. He describes it to be of about four inches long; the belly of it white, cartilagi (6160) nous and transparent; without eyes or head (that he could observe,) but in stead of a head, it hath a hollow snout encompassed with a very hard membrane, differing in colour and substance from the belly; which snout it thrusts whole into the body of the fish, (as strongly as an auger is wound into a piece of wood,) and fills it full of blood unto the very orifice. It hath a tail shaped like a feather, serving for its motion, and, under it, two filamenst or slender fibres, longer than the whole Insect, whereby, it seems, it clings about stones or herbs, and sticks the closer in the body of the Sword-fish; of which it attacks those parts only, where the fins of the fish cannot touch or trouble it; the Observer affirming, that he hath often found it sticking in the back and in the belly, and sometimes close to the head, sometimes close to the tail of that fish, but always far enough from the fins. Within its belly he noted some vessels, like small guts, reaching from one end of it to the other, which by the pressure of his nail he made reach to the orifice of the snout, whence they retired back of themselves to their natural scituation; they seeming to be the instruments for sucking the blood, because the snout is in it self an empty part, destitute of fibres and valves to draw and suck with; whereas these vessels have a motion resembling that of a pump, in which the snout of this animal serves for a sucker, drawing the blood from end to the other: And the belly of this Insect being framed ring-wise, the structure serves to thrust the said inner vessels unto the orifice of the trunk, and to draw them back again. This creature as it torments the Swordfish, so it is, by our bservers relation, vexed it self by another Insect, which he calls a Lowse, of an ash colour, fastened towards the tail of this Leech as fermly, as a sea-snail is to a rock. 'Tis of the bigness of a pea, and hath an opening, whence come out many small winding and hairy threds. It hath not been observed, (as far as our Author could learn,) to trouble, or to be upon, any other animal than this Leech.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)
(489) II. A Discourse concerning the Large Horns frequently found under Ground in Ireland, Concluding from them that the great American Deer, call'd a Moose, was formerly common in that Island: With Remarks on some other things Natural to that Country. By Thomas Molyneux, M. D. Fellow of the King and Queens Colledge of Physicians in Ireland, and of the Royal Society in England.

THThat no real Species of Living Creatures is so utterly extinct, as to be lost entirely out of the World, since it was first Created, is the Opinion of many Naturalists; and ’tis grounded on so good a Principle of Providence taking Care in general of all its Animal Productions, that it deserves our Assent. However great Vicissitudes may be observed to attend the Works of Nature, as well as Humane Affairs; so that some entire Species of Animals, which have been formerly Common, nay even numerons in certain Countries; have, in Process of time, been soperfectly lost, as to become there utterly unknown; tho’ at the same time it cannot be denyed, but the kind has been carefully preserved in some other part of the World.

Of this we have a remarkable Example in Ireland, in a most large and stately Beast, that undoubtedly has been frequent in this Kingdom, tho’ now clear (490) ly extinct; and that so many Ages past, as there remains among us not the least Record in Writing, or any manner of Tradition, that makes so much as mention of its Name; as that most Laborious Inquirer into the pretended Ancient, but certainly Fabulous History of this Country, Mr. Roger O Flaherty, the Author of Ogygia, has lately informed me.

What Discoveries therefore we make of this Creature, we can only have from those loose parts of it we find dug out of the Earth by Accident, preserved there so many Ages from Corruption, by lying deep and close under Ground, whilst harder and of themselves more durable Bodies, moulder away and perish, by being exposed to the various Changes of the Air, and repeated Injuries of the Weather.

By the Remains we have of this Animal, it appears to have been of the Genus Cervinum or Deer Kind, and of that sort that carries Broad or Palmed Hornes, bearing a greater affinity with the Buck or Fallow Deer, than with the Stag or Red Deer, that has Hornes round and branched, without a Palme; This I lately observed, having an opportunity of particularly Examining a compleat Head, with both its Horns entirely perfect, not long since dug up, given to my Brother William Molyneux, as a Natural Curiosity by Mr. Henry Osborn, that lives at a place call'd Dardistown, in the County of Meath, about Two Miles from Drogheda, who writ him the following Account of the manner and place they were found in.

I have by the Bearer sent the Head and Horns I promised you; this is the third Head I have found by casual trenching in my Orchard; they were all dug up (491) within the Compass of an Acre of Land, and lay about four or five Foot under Ground, in a sort of Boggy Soil. The first Pitch was of Earth, the next two or three of Turff, and then followed a sort of white Marle, where they were found: They must have lain there several Ages, to be so deep enterred. (Thus far Mr. Osborn.)

I took their Dimensions carefully as follows; from the extreme tip of the right Horn, to the extreme tip of the left, as exprest in the annext Table, Figure the first. by the prick’t Line A. B. was ten Foot ten Inches, from the tip of the right Horn, to the Root where it was fastned to the Head, Exprest by the Line C. D. five Foot two Inches from the Tip of the highest Branch (measuring one of the Horns transverse, or directly across the Palme) to the tip of the lowest Branch, exprest by the Line G. F. Three Foot Seven Inches and a Half. The length of one of the Palms within the Branches, exprest by the Line G. H. Two Foot Six Inches: The breadth of the same Palm, still within the Branches, exprest by the Line I. K. One Foot Ten Inches and a half: The Branches that shot forth round the edge of each Palm, were Nine in Number, besides the Brow Antlers, of which the right Antler, exprest by the Line D. L. was a Foot and Two Inches in length, the other was much shorter: The Beam of each Horn at some distance from the Head, where ’tis mark’d M. was about Two Inches and Six tenths of an Inch, in Diameter, or about Eight Inches in Circumference; at the Root where it was fastned to the Head, about Eleven Inches in Circumference. The length of the Head, from the back of the Skull to the tip of the Nose, or rather the extremity of the upper Jaw-bone, exprest in the Figure by the Line N. O. Two Foot, (492) the breadth of the Skull where largest, mark'd by the Line P.Q. was a Foot.

The Two Holes near the Roots of the Horns, that look like Eyes were not so, (for these were placed on each side the Head in Two ample Cavities, that could not be well exprest in the Figure) but were large open Passages, near an Inch in Diameter in the Forehead Bone, to give way to great Blood-vessels, that here issue forth from the Head, and pass between the Surface of the Horn, and the smooth Hairy Skin that Covers them whilst they are growing, (which is commonly call’d the Velvet) to supply the Horns with sufficient Nourishment, while they are soft, and till they arrive at their full Magnitude, so as to become perfectly hard and solid. These Vessels, by reason of their largeness and great turgency of the Humor in them; whilst the Horn is sprouting and pliant, make deep and conspicuous furrows all along the outside of it where they pass; which may plainly be seen after the Horn is bare and come to its full growth; at which time all these Veins and Arteries, with the outward Velvet Skin, drying by the Course of Nature, shrivel up and separate from the Horn, and the Beast affects tearing them off in great stripes against the Bows of Trees, exposing his Horns naked, when they are throughly hardned, without any Covering at all. This I gather, by what Remarks I have made on the Skulls of other Deer, and what I have observed concerning the growth of these sort of Horns in Animals of the like kind, tho' not in this particular sort of Creature.

The Figure I had exactly taken by a skilful Hand, to shew truly the right shape and size of these kind of (493) Horns we so commonly find here under Ground in Ireland; and have likewise added a Draught of a pair of common Stags Horns, exprest Figure the 2d. and another of a pair of common Bucks Horns, exprest Figure the 3d. all done according to the same Scale; that by this means, at one and the same time, may appear the grand disproportion between these sorts of Heads, and also the difference and agreement in their Shape. (See the Table.)

Such then were the vast Dimensions, according to which the lofty Fabrick of the Head and Horns of this stately Creature was Built; and doubtless all the rest of the parts of its Body answered these in a due proportion. So that should we compare the fairest Buck with the Symetry of this mighty Beast, it must certainly fall as much short of its Proportions as the smallest young Fawn, compared to the largest over-grown Buck.

And yet ’tis not to be question’d, but these spacious Horns, as large as they were, like others of the Deer Kind, were naturally cast every Year, and grew again to their full Size in about the Space of Four Months: For all Species of Deer, yet known, certainly drop their Horns yearly, and with us ’tis about March, and about July following they are full summ'd again. Of which strange Appearance in Nature, the learned Gerrardus Johannes Vossius making mention in his excellent Book De Idololatriâ, Lib. 3. Cap. 57. has these Words: Ponam inter Naturæ maximè admiranda breviculo adeo Tempore tam solida duraq; tantæ Molis Cornua enasci (a). (a) That is, I shall reckon it among the most wonderful Works of Nature, that Horns so hard and solid, and of so great a Bulk, should grow up in so short a time. (494) And the inquisitive Italian Philosopher, Francisco Redi, in his Experimenta circa res Naturates, &c. on the same Occasion expresses himself thus: Maximâ profecto admiratione dignum est tantam Molem Cornuum & Ramorum tam brevi tempore quotannis renasci & crescere (b). And if these judicious Persons were moved thus with Admiration by considering only the yearly Falling and sudden Growth of these smaller Horns of Bucks and Stags, with which alone they were acquainted, what would they have thought, had they known of these vast and stupendious Productions of Nature in the same Kind.

As there seems to me no small Affinity or Agreement in the Sprouting forth, and Branching of Deers Horns, with the way of Growth in Vegetables; so I conceive likewise the constant yearly dropping of them, to proceed much from the same Cause, that Trees annually cast their ripe Fruit, or let fall their withering Leaves in Autumn: that is, because the nourishing Juice, say it is Sap or Blood, is stopt and flows no longer; either on the account ’tis now deficient, being all spent, or that the cavous Passages which conveigh it, dry up and cools; so as the Part having no longer any Communication with, must of necessity by degrees sever from the Whole; but with this Difference, that Horns by reason of their hard Material and strong Composition, stick fast to the Head by their Root, Seven or Eight Months after all their Nourishment perfectly retires; whereas Leaves and Fruit, consisting of a much more tender Substance and a finer Texture of Parts, drop sooner from their native (b) That is, Truly it deserves our greatest Wonder that so large a Body of Horns and Branches should sprout up in so short a time, and be renewed every Year. (495) Beds where they grew, when once the Supply of usual Nourishment is stopt; this Analogy that Nature observes in casting the Horns of Beasts and dropping the Fruit of Trees, will appear much more evident to any one that will observe the end of a Stalk, from which a ripe Orange or any such large Fruit has been lately sever’d, and the Butt end of a cast Horn where it fasten'd to the Os Frontis: for by comparing them together, he shall find so great a Congruity in the shape of both, that ’twill be apparent Nature works according to the same Mechanism in one as in t’other.

Discoursing one Day with his Excellency the Lord Capell, then one of the Lord Justices of Ireland, an experienc’d and accurate Observer of the Works of Nature, I chanced to mention these Large Horns: He was very earnest to see them, and so mightily surpris’d at the sight of their extraordinary Bulk, that my Brother thought fit to make a Present of them to his Lordship, which he obligingly accepted; resolving to send them over, as he said, to his Majesty King William.

Such another Head, with both the Horns intire was found some Years since by one Mr. Van Delure in the County of Clare, buried Ten Foot under Ground in a sort of Marle, and were presented by him to the late Duke of Ormond, then Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, who valued them so highly for their prodigious largeness, that he thought them not an unfit Present for the King, and sent them for England to King Charles the Second, who ordered them to be set up in the Horn-Gallery at Hampton Court; where they may still be seen among the rest of the large Heads both of Stags and Bucks that adorn that Place, but this so vastly exceeds the largest of them, that the rest appear to lose much of their (496) Curiosity by being viewed in Company with this. I am lately informed, these with the other Heads are since removed to the Guard-Room out of the Horn- Gallery.

In the Year 1691., Major Folliot told me, that digging for Marle near the Town Ballymackward, where he lives, not far from Ballyshannon in the County of Fermanagh, he found buried Ten Foot under plain solid Ground, a Pair of these sort of Horns, which he keeps still in his Possession.

In the Year 1684., there were Two of these Heads dug up near Turvy, the Mansion Seat of the Lord Barnevall, within Eight Miles of Dublin; that which was most compleat of the Two was fixt over the Chimney in the Publick Hall; and there still remains as an ancient and lasting Curiosity to future Ages.

Not long since, a Head of this Kind with its Horns was found near Portumny, the House of the Earls of Clanricard, seated on the River Shannon, in the County of Gallway, where it is carefully preserved, and still admired by all that view it.

Such a Forehead with Two extraordinary Beams of these Kind of Horns, may be now seen fastened against one side of the Common Hall of his Grace Michael Lord Archbishop of Ardmagh's House here in Dublin; they are both imperfect and want their Palmes, yet by the vast thickness and length of the Beams, I judge when entire they much exceeded the Size of those I have given the Dimensions of above. The Primate told me, they were found somewhere in the Province of Ulster, (497) and presented to the Earl of Essex, then Governor of Ireland, who gave them his Grace.

To these I should add many more Instances of the like, as those found by the late Lord Mountjoy, near his House at Newtown-Stewart; and those kept at Stockallen in the County of Meath, for to my Knowledge within less than Twenty Years, above Twenty, I might safely say, Thirty Pair of these sort of Horns have been dug up in several places of this Country, all found by Accident; and we may well suppose vast Numbers still remain undiscovered, but to mention any more of them particularly would be tedious, and to little purpose, since these may suffice plainly to shew, this Creature was formerly Common with us in Ireland; and an Indigenous Animal, not peculiar to any Territory or Province, but universally met with in all parts of the Kingdom.

For if we draw a Line through the several Places of this Island where these Heads have been found, viz. the County of Clare, the County of Dublin, and the County of Farmanagh, omitting those other parts I have mentioned, we shall make a Triangle whose shortest Side will be in length above an Hundred English Miles, which is near as large a Figure of this Sort, as we can well describe in the Map of Ireland.

And besides, we may reasonably, I think, gather; That they were not only common in this Country, but by what Mr. Osborn mentions in his Letter to my Brother, That they were a Gregarious Animal, as the Naturalists call them, or such a sort of Creature as affect naturally keeping together in Herds; as we see the Fallow Deer with us, and as 'tis reported of the Elches in (498) Sweden, and the Rain Deer in the Northern Countries of Europe; for otherwise we cannot easily fancy it should happen; that Three of their Heads should be all found within the narrow Compass of one Acre of Ground.

That these and several others, and indeed I think I may say, all that I have been particularly informed of, though dug up in far distant Places of Ireland, should be constantly found buried in a Sort of Marle, seems to me to intimate, as if Marle was only a Soil that had been formerly the Outward Surface of the Earth, but in process of Time, being covered by degrees with many Layers of Adventitious Earth, has by lying under Ground a certain Number of Ages, acquired a peculiar Texture, Consistence, Richness, or Maturity that gives it the Name of Marle. For of necessity we must allow the Place where these Heads are now found, was certainly once the external Superfice of the Ground; otherwise ’tis hardly possible to suppose how they should come there.

And that they should be so deep buried as we at present find them, appears to have happen’d, by their accidentally falling where it was soft low Ground; so that the Horns by their own considerable Gravity might easily make a Bed where they setled in the yielding Earth; and in a very long Course of Time, the higher Lands being by degrees dissolved by repeated Rains, and washt and brought down by Floods, covered those Places that were scituated lower with many Layers of Earth: For all high Grounds and Hills, unless they consist of Rock, by this means naturally lose a little every Year of their Height; and sometimes sensibly become lower even in one Age; of which we may see several satisfactory Instances related by Dr. Plott in his (499) Natural History of Staffordshire, Chap. 3. Page 113. as for all such Heads that might chance to fall on high or hard Grounds, where they could not possibly be covered or defended, these must of necessity rot, perish, and be destroyed by the Weather: And for this Reason it is, that never any of these Horns are discovered in such sort of Ground, but always in a light Soil, and in some low Part of the Country.

By what means this Kind of Animal, formerly so common and numerous in this Country, should now become utterly lost and extinct, deserves our Consideration: and seeing it is so many Ages past, that we have no manner of Account left to help us in our Enquiry, the most we can do in this Matter is to make some probable Conjectures about it; I know some have been apt to imagine this like all other Animals might have beeen destroyed from off the Face of this Country by that Flood recorded in the Holy Scripture to have happened in the the time of Noah; which I confess is a ready and short way to solve this Difficulty, but does not at all satisfy me: For (besides that that there want not Arguments, and some of them not easily answer’d, against the Deluge being Universal) if we consider what a fragil, slight and porous Substance these and the Horns of all Deer are, we can't well suppose they could by any means be preserv’d entire and uncorrupt from the Flood, now above Four Thousand Years since; and I have by me some of the Teeth, and one of the lower Jaw-bones of this Creature so perfect, solid, ponderous and fresh, that no one that sees them can possibly suspect they could have been in nature so many Ages past: And therefore it seems more likely to me, this kind of Animal might become extinct here from a certain ill Constitution of Air in (500) some of the past Seasons long since the Flood, which might occasion an Epidemick Distemper, if we may so call it, or Pestilential Murren, peculiarly to affect this sort of Creature, so as to destroy at once great Numbers of 'em, if not quite ruine the Species.

And this is not so groundless an Assertion as at first it may appear, if we consider this Island may very well be thought neither a Country nor Climate so truly proper and natural to this Animal, as to be perfectly agreeable to its temper; since for ought I can yet learn it neither is, nor ever has been an Inhabitant of any of the adjacent Kingdoms round about us. And besides, the Three Heads above mentioned, found so close to one another in the County of Meath, and the Two near Turvy, seems not a little to countenance this Opinion; as if these Animals dyed together in Numbers, as they had lived together in Herds.

To this purpose I have met with a remarkable Passage in Scheffer's Description of Lapland, Chap. 28. speaking of the Cervus Rangifer, an Animal that agrees in Kind with ours, though it be a quite different Sort of Deer, he says that whole Herds of them are often destroy’d by a Raging Distemper common among them; these are his Words: Est & Morbis suis genus hoc Obnoxium qui si ingruant Gregem totum solent pervagare & ad necem dare; qua de re Johannes Bureus ita habet in Schedis suis, solet interdum Rangiferos morbus quidam velut Pestis invadere sic ut moriantur omnes Lappoq; compellatur novos sibi comparare Rangiferos (c). By (c) That is, this Kind of Creature is likewise subject to its Diseases which if they seize a Flock, goes through them all; concerning which Johannes Bureus, has it thus in his Papers; sometimes a sort of Disease after the manner of a Plague, affects the Rain Deer, so as they all dye, and the Laplander is forced to supply himself with new Rain Deer. (501) which we may see what we conjecture in our Case, is not meer Supposition, but certainly happens elsewhere to Animals of the like Kind.

But since we have an Instance of so destructive a Mortality among Beasts as quite to extinguish a whole Species at once, we may think some might have escaped the Common Calamity; but these being so few in Number, I imagine as the Country became peopled, and thickly inhabited; they were soon destroy'd, and kill'd like other Venison as well for the sake of Food as Mastery and Diversion. And indeed none of these Animals by reason of their Stupendious Bulk and Wide Spreading Horns could possibly lye sheltered long in any Place, but must be soon discovered, and being so conspicuous and heavy were the more easily pursued and taken by their numerous Hunters, in a Country all environed by the Sea: For had they been on the wide Continent they might have fared better, and secured themselves and their Race till this time, as well as others of the same Kind have done elsewhere. Of which more hereafter.

Or had those Barbarous Times been capable of taking Care for the Preservation of this stately Creature, our Country would not have entirely lost so singular and beautiful an Ornament: But this could not be expected from those savage Ages of the World, which certainly would not have spared the rest of the Deer Kind, Stags and Hinds, Bucks and Does, which we still have; but that these being of much smaller Size, could shelter and conceal themselves easier under the Covert of Woods and Mountains, so as to escape utter Destruction.

(502)

And here I cannot but observe, that the Red Deer in these our Days, is much more rare with us in Ireland, than it has been formerly, even in the Memory of Man: And tho’ I take it to be a Creature, naturally more peculiar to this Country then to England, yet unless there be some care taken to preserve it, I believe in process of time this Kind may be lost also, like the other sort we were now speaking of.

It remains we should say something concerning the Proper Name of this Animal, and what Species of Creature it was to which these stately Horns formerly belonged. And I must here needs own, that I have not met to this Day with any Person, that has spent the least serious thought concerning this matter. So destitute have we been in this Place of that inquisitive Genius, that in these later Ages has so much everywhere prevailed, in setting the Minds of Men upon a diligent search after, and making curious and useful Remarks, on all things that are truly the admirable Workmanship of Nature.

I know they are vulgarly call'd by ignorant People, nay, and some of the learned Vulgus in this Country, Elches Hornes; and that they are so, is an Opinion generally received, and satisfies such as talk of them Superficially, without further Enquiry; and because this is an Error that has so Universally prevailed, I shall take the more pains particularly to Confute it, and I hope clear this point so from all manner of doubt, that for the future there shall be no further questions made of it again; the mistake, I am satisfied, has only proceeded from hence, that we are in these parts as great Strangers to that sort of Animal call'd the Alche Elche, or Elende, as we are to this of our own (503) Country, knowing by hear-say only, that ’tis a large Beast with big Horns; but unless we shall give the same Name to Two Animals vastly different, which is Preposterous and breeds Confusion, we must not allow these Horns should any longer pass under the Name of Elches Horns.

I have seen a Pair of genuine Elches Horns brought out of Swedeland, and they differed extremely, both in Figure and Size, from these we have now described: they were abundantly smaller, quite of another shape and make, not Palmed or broad at the end farthest from the Head as Ours; but on the contrary, broader towards the Head, and growing still narrower towards the Tips end, the smaller Branches not issuing forth from both Edges of the Horns as in Ours, but growing along the upper Edge only, whilst the other Verge of the Horn was wholly plain without any Branches at all.

And accordingly the faithful Gesner, in the first Chapter of his Book De Quadrupedibus, has given us the right Description of them, where he expresses the Figure of the Elche and its Horns apart; and speaking of the Size of them, he says, Cornua singula Libras circiter Duodecem appendunt, longitudine fere duorum pedum (d). Whereas the Horns we find here in Ireland are near thrice that Length, and above double that Weight; though dry'd and much lighter from their being so long kept: But I confess, I say, this only by estimate, not having an opportunity to weigh exactly a single Horn by itself, though I'm sure I can't be much out.

(d) That is, each Horn weighs about Twelve Pounds, and was in length almost Two Foot. (504)

Moreover the Elche, as described by Apolonius Menabenus, who had seen many of them, is no larger than a midling Horse: these are areare his own Words, as quoted by Aldrovandus: Habet hoc Animal crassitiem & proceritatem mediocris & pinguis Equi (e). And agreeable to this is the Relation given in the Memoirs of the Parisian Anatomists, who dissected one of them: And I remember Mr. Duncombe, then one of the Lords Justices of Ireland, told me, when he was Envoy in Sweden, he had seen there above a Hundred Elches together in a Herd, and none of them above Five Foot high; and if so, we cannot imagine a Creature of that small Size, could possibly support so large and heavy a Head, with so wide and spreading a Pair of Horns as these we are speaking of; considering that exact Symetry, and due Proportion of Parts, Nature observes in the Formation of all the larger and perfecter sort of Animals.

We must then look out, and try if we can discover among the various Species of Quadrupeds, some other, whose Size and Description will better agree with this our Irish Animal than that of the Elche does: And after all our Inquiry, we certainly shan't discover any one that in all respects exactly answers it, save only that Lofty Horned Beast in the West-Indies, call'd, a Moose.

This Animal I find described by Mr. John Josselyn, among his New England Rarities in these Words: The Moose Deer, common in these Parts, is a very goodly Creature, some of them Twelve Foot high (in height, says another Author more particularly, From the Toe of the Fore foot to the Pitch of the Shoulder, Twelve Foot; in (e) That is, this Animal is about the Height and Thickness of a midling Horse. (505) its full growth much bigger than an Ox) with exceeding fair Horns with broad Palms, some of them Two Fathom or Twelve foot from the Tip of one Horn to the other. That is, Fourteen Inches wider than Ours was.

Another thus describes the Manner of the Indians Hunting this Creature: They commonly hunt the Moose, which is a kind of Deer, in the Winter, and run him down sometimes in half, otherwhile a whole Day, when the Ground is cover'd with Snow, which usually lyes here Four Foot deep; the Beast, very heavy, sinks every Step as he runs, breaking down Trees as big as a Man's Thigh with his Horns, at length they get up with't, and darting their Lances, wound it so, that the Creature walks heavily on, till tired and spent with loss of Blood, it sinks and falls like a ruin'd Building, making the Earth shake under it. Thus far what these Authors say of the Moose.

I do not know any one that has yet obliged the Publick by giving an exact Figure of this stately Creature, which would be acceptable to the Curious, and very well worth the while of some of those ingenious Inquirers that go into those Parts for the improvement of Natural History: for I take it next the Elephant, to be the most remarkable Quadruped for its largeness in the World. However, in the mean time, by the help of the foregoing Accounts, we may easily form to our selves a lively and just Idea of its Figure and Size; and if we compare the several Parts of those Discriptions, with the Beasts whose heads are found here in Ireland; we shall not have the least Reason to question but these vastly large Irish Deer and the American Moose, were certainly one and the same sort of Animal, being all of the Deer Kind, carrying the same sort of Palmed Horns, which are of the same Size and Largeness as well (506) as Figure; and Bulk of their Bodies corresponding exactly in Proportion to the wide spreading of their Horns; So that we may securely assert, that Mooses formerly were as frequent in this Country, as they have them still in the Northern Parts of the West Indies, New England, Virginia, Maryland, Canada or New France.

And least we may think this Animal peculiar to the Continent, and not to be found in Islands; I lately met with a remarkable Passage in John de Laet's French Description of the West Indies, that clearly shews the contrary; which, because it likewise illustrates and confirms what was said before, I'll set down in his own Words. Speaking of New England, says he; I'l y a une certaine sorte de Beste frequente en ces Pais que les sauvages noment Mose, de la grandur d'un Taureau, ayant la Teste d'un Dain, avec les cornes larges que muent tous les anns, le Col comme une cerf: il se trouve une grande quantite de ces animaux en une Isle pres de la Terre Ferme appelle des Anglois Mount Mansel. That is, There is a certain sort of Beast common in this Country, which the savage Indians call a Moose, as big as a Bull (he had not seen I suppose those of the largest Size) having the Head of a Buck, with broad Horns, which they cast every Year, and the Neck of a Deer: there are found also great Numbers of these Animals in an Island near the Continent call'd by the English, Mount Mansell.

This may give us reasonable grounds to believe, that as this Island of Mount Mansell must of necessity had some Communication with the Main Land of America, to have been thus plentifully stockt with this sort of Beast; so Ireland, for the same Reason, must in the many past Ages, long before the late Discovery of that New World, had some sort of Intercourse with it likewise, (though (507) 'tis not easy, I acknowledge, for us at present to explain how) for otherwise I do not see, how we can conceive this Country should be supply'd with this Creature, that for ought I can yet hear, is not to be found in all our Neighbourhood round about us, nay, perhaps in any other Part of Europe, Asia or Africa: And then 'tis certain as Ireland is the last or most Western part of the Old World; so 'tis nearest of any Country to the most Eastern Parts of the New-Canada, New-England, Virginia, &c. the great Tract of Land, and the only one I yet know, remarkable for plenty of the Moose-Deer.

And we may observe yet farther, That a sort of Alliance between these Countries of Ireland and the West Indies, appears likewise in other things, of which they partake both in common. For as they on the Coast of New-England and the Island Bermudas gather considerable Quantities of Amber-greese; so on the Western Coast of Ireland, along the Counties of Sligo, Mayo, Kerry and the Isles of Arran they frequently meet with large parcels of that precious Substance, so highly valued for its Perfume. In the Year 1691. Mr. Constantine an Apothecary of Dublin, shewed me one piece of Amber -greese found near Sligo, that weigh'd Fifty Two Ounces; he bought it for Twenty Pound, and sold it in London afterwards for above a Hundred. On the out-side 'twas of a close compact Substance, Blackish and shining like Pitch; but when it was cut the inside was more porous, and something of a Yellowish Colour, not so Grey, close and smooth as the cleanest and best sort of Amber; but like it, speckled with whitish Grains, and of a most fragrant Sent; I have still a Piece of it by me, that weighs above Six Drams, with several Samples of Three or Four other sorts of Amber, all found on that Coast of Ireland; some entirely black as Pitch, others (508) of a perfect White Substance, exactly answering the Descrption of that sort of Amber, Olaus Wormius mentions in his Musæum, Page 34. under the Name of Ambræ Grifeæ nondum maturæ.

Nor is the kind of Whale-Fish that's often taken in New-England, and affords the true Sperma Ceti a Strangger to the Coast of Ireland that respects America. This we may properly, I think, with Dr. Charleton, call the Cetus Dentatus, from its large, solid, white Teeth, fixt only in the lower Jaw; to distinguish it from that Species that gives the Whale Bone, most naturally named by Aristotle in his Historia Animalium Mysticetus, from its bearded, horny Laminæ in the Roof of its Mouth: of which kind likewise there have been Three or Four stranded in my time; but on the Eastern Coast of this Country that regards England.

This Cetus Dentatus is faithfully described by Carolus Clusius, in his Sixth Book of Exotics, Chapter the 17th, under the Name of Cete, aliud admirabile; and truly figured by John Stonus in his Historia Piscium, Table the 42d. and by Mr. Ray in his Ichthyographia, Table the 1st. but by both under the too general Name of the Balena. There have been Three of this Kind taken to my Knowledge, in the Space of Six Years, all on the Western Coast of this Country; one near Colerane, in the County of Antrim; another about Ship-harbour, in the County of Donnegall; and a Third in August, 1691. Seventy one Foot long, exceeding that described by Clusius, Nineteen Foot, towards where Bally-shannon, where Lough-Erne discharges its Waters into the Western Ocean.

And then it was, I had an Opportunity of truly informing my self what sort of Substance Sperma Ceti is, (509) and in what Part of the Whale 'tis found: concerning which Matter, Physicians and Naturalists have given the World such various and false accounts; and 'tis truly nothing else, but part of the Oyl or liquid Fat of this particular sort of Whale; which Oyl, at first when confused and mixt, shews it self like a Whitish Liquour, of the Consistence and Colour of Whey; but lay'd by in Vessels to settle; its parts by degrees separate, that which is lighter and swims a top, becomes a clear Oyl pellucid like Water, serviceable for all the uses of common Train-Oyl, got out of the Blubber of other Whales, and that which subsides, because 'tis heavier and of a closer Consistence, candies together at the Bottom, and is what is sold for Sperma Ceti, at Twelve Shillings the Pound; when 'tis throughly blanched and refined from all its filth and the remaining parts of the Oyl, that otherwise discolours it, and gives it a rancid offensive Sent. Of this Substance several Hundred Pound Weight may be gotten out of one Whale, but the cleansing and curing of it is troublesom, and requires no small Art, Time and Charge; which occasions the value of that which is througly refined: The Fat of the whole Body affords it, but that of the Head gives the greatest Quantity and purest Sperma Ceti.

I have some reason to believe to these Instances of the Moose Deer, Amber-greese and Sperma Ceti, of which Ireland partakes more than any other Country of Europe from its Neighbourhood with the Northern America, we may likewise add some of our more rare Spontaneous Plants, because they are found growing only in those Western Parts of Ireland, and no where else in this whole Country, or any of the Neighbouring Kingdoms about us.

(510)

I shall mention but Two or Three of many which I have been told are peculiar to those parts, because I am not yet well assur'd of the certainty of the others being so: and those are the Arbutus sive Unedo, or the Strawberry Tree; not to be found any where of Spontaneous Growth nearer than the most Southern Parts of France, Italy and Sicily; and there too, 'tis never known but as a Frutex or Shrub: whereas in the Rocky Parts of the County of Kerry about Loughlane, and in the Islands of the same Lough, where the People of the Country call it the Cane Apple, it flourishes naturally to that Degree, as to become a large tall Tree. Petrus Bellonius in his First Book of Observations, Chapter the 43d, takes notice, it does so in Mount Athos in Macedony; and Juba is quoted by Pliny in the Fifteenth Book of his Natural History, Chapter the 24th, as mentioning a thing extraordinary, for saying the Arbutus grows to a high Tree in Arabia; the Trunks of those in Ireland are frequently Four Foot and a half in Circumference, or Eighteen Inches in Diameter, and the Trees grows to about Nine or Ten Yards in Height; and in such plenty that they now cut them down, as the chief Fewel to melt and refine the Ore of the Silver and Lead Mine, lately discovered near the Castle of Ross, in the County of Kerry.

The other Plant I shall take Notice of is Cotyledon, sive Sedum serratum Latifolium Montanum guttato flore Parkinsoni & Raii, vulgarly call'd by the Gardners London Pride: I suppose because of its pretty elegant Flower; that viewed near at hand and examined closely, appears very beautiful, consisting of great Variety of Parts: The whole Plant is most accurately described by that profound Naturalist Mr. Ray, in his Historia Plantarum, Page 1046. where speaking of the Place (511) where it grows, he has these Words: Planta in Hortis nostris frequentissima est, ubi tamen Sponte oritur nobis Nondum constat, est autem proculdubio Montium incola (f). Though he knew no certain place where it grew Spontaneous, not having met with it in all his Travels; nor any Author mentioning its native Country, yet he rightly conjectures 'tis a Mountainous Plant, for it grows plentifully here with us in Ireland, on a Mountain call'd the Mangerton in Kerry, Six or Seven Miles over, and reputed the highest in Ireland, Two Miles from the Town of Killarny, and Four Miles from the Castle of Ross: Here it spreads it self so abundantly, as to cover great part of the Mountain, and for as much as I understand, like the Arbutus, 'tis peculiar to this County alone.

Whether both the foregoing Plants are truly American, I cannot at present determine, but this I know, that Sabina Vulgaris, or Common Savin is mentioned by Mr. Josselyn, in the Book before quoted, as a Plant common on the Hills of New-England; and I have been assured by an Apothecary of this Town, that he has gathered Savin growing wild as a native Shrub in one of the Islands of Lough-Lane, in the County of Kerry; and if so, I have reason to believe, that hereafter farther Inquiry may add to these I have given, several other Examples of Things Natural and Common to that and this Country.

But to leave these Digressions and return to our Large Irish Deer, which well deserves we should affix to it some Characteristick Note or Proper Name, (f) That is, 'tis a Plant common in our Gardens; but where it grows naturally is not as yet known to us, but certainly 'tis an Inhabitant of the Mountains. (512) whereby it may stand ranged hereafter in its right Place in the History of Animals: since Nature her self seems by the Vast Magnitude and Stately Horns, she has given this Creature, to have singled it out as it were, and shewed it such regard, with a design to distinguish it remarkably from the common Herd of all other smaller Quadrupeds. Naturalists have rais'd much Dispute, what Beast it truly is, that has had the Name given it by some of them, of Animal Magnum; Dodonæus, Menabenus, and others, would have it the Elche; Scaliger would have it the Bisons of Pliny, whether 'twas one or t'other, or neither, I shan't determine; nor do I the least suspect that this our Animal was meant by it; however, for its goodly Size and lofty Stature, and to retain something of an Old Appellation, I think it may very well lay claim to it, and not improperly be call'd, Cervus Platyceros Altissimus; sive Animal Magnum Cornibus Palmatis, incolis Novæ Anglæ & Virginiæ, ubi frequens, Moose dictum.