The Digital Ark: Early Modern Collections of Curiosities in England and Scotland, 1580-1700

[ Previous ][ Next ]

Fabio Colonna (1567 - 1640)

References in Documents:
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 17 Pectunculus albus polyleptogynglimos columnæ, crassissimus, latis strijs; profundè in ambitu crenatus. White Pectunculus, the Polyleptogynglimos of Colonna, very thick-walled, with wide striations; deeply crenulated at the edge.
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 31 Pectunculites anomius ;ίoϐ Fab. Columnæ. Nat. Hist. Com. Stafs. p. 185 Irregular, trilobed pectunculus of Fabio Colonna. Plot 1686, p. 185
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 10 Conchites Πoλυλεπτογιτγυμθ. Fabius Columnæ. Ibid. Conchites polyleptognilimis of Fabio Colonna. Plot 1686, p. 184
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 23 Fungi lapidei coralloides Fab. Colũnæ. Ibid. P. 189. Petrified coralloid fungi, of Fabio Colonna. Plot 1686, p. 189.
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 24 Fungi lapidei coralloides Fab. Colũnæ. Ibid. p. 189. Petrified coralloid fungi, of Fabio Colonna. Plot 1686, p. 189.
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 25 Fungi lapidei coralloides Fab. Colũnæ. Ibid. p. 189. Petrified coralloid fungi, of Fabio Colonna. Plot 1686, p. 189.
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 51 Conchites πoλυλεπτίγτλυρθ Fab. Columnæ lævis cæruleus. Conchites polyleptognilimis, smooth and blue, of Fabio Colonna.
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 13 Conchites πoλυλεπτογλυρθ Columnæ fractus. Conchites, polyleptognilimis of Colonna; broken.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SKULL of the RIVER-HORSE or HIPPOPOTAMUS. If we respect his Figure, he were more properly called BUPOTAMUS, or RIVER-OXE. And accordingly the Germans rightly call him Wasser- Ocks; and the Italians at Constantinople BOMARIN. The same Animal, which in the Book of Job is called BEHEMOTH; as is solidly proved by Bochart, in his Hierozoicon. He is almost every where described very falslyfalsely. Aristotle falsly falsely gives him a Maine, like that of a Horse: deluded, 'tis likely, by the Name. Kircher (d) (d) Chin. Illustr. falsly falsely gives him all Horse Teeth. In the Musæum Romanum, he is described with double Hoofs like an Ox, and pictured with four or five Claws like a Bear; neither truly. Bellonius, who saw one alive, but yet very young, was the first that hath given any tollerable Description of him. Yet as to the Teeth, he is mistaken, comparing them all to those of a Horse: probably because they were not yet grown. (e) Fab. Colum. lib. de Aquat. & Terrest. (e) But Columna, who also saw one, and that full grown, hath given a most accurate Description hereof, his principal Characters being these; Four yards and half long, about two yards high, a yard and half broad. Short leg'd. Cloven-hoofed; yet not with two, but four Hoofs. Tailed like a Tortoise. (Or like a Hog, (f)(f) Solinus and others quoted by Bochart. which he also twists in the same manner) Head almost like an Ox. His Chaps wide. His Eyes small. His fore Teeth prodigiously great, being some of them ½ a foot round about, above ¼ of a foot long; as is evident in the Skull here preserved; and other particulars mention'd by Columna in his copious Description hereof.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SKULL of the RIVER-HORSE or HIPPOPOTAMUS. If we respect his Figure, he were more properly called BUPOTAMUS, or RIVER-OXE. And accordingly the Germans rightly call him Wasser- Ocks; and the Italians at Constantinople BOMARIN. The same Animal, which in the Book of Job is called BEHEMOTH; as is solidly proved by Bochart, in his Hierozoicon. He is almost every where described very falslyfalsely. Aristotle falsly falsely gives him a Maine, like that of a Horse: deluded, 'tis likely, by the Name. Kircher (d) (d) Chin. Illustr. falsly falsely gives him all Horse Teeth. In the Musæum Romanum, he is described with double Hoofs like an Ox, and pictured with four or five Claws like a Bear; neither truly. Bellonius, who saw one alive, but yet very young, was the first that hath given any tollerable Description of him. Yet as to the Teeth, he is mistaken, comparing them all to those of a Horse: probably because they were not yet grown. (e) Fab. Colum. lib. de Aquat. & Terrest. (e) But Columna, who also saw one, and that full grown, hath given a most accurate Description hereof, his principal Characters being these; Four yards and half long, about two yards high, a yard and half broad. Short leg'd. Cloven-hoofed; yet not with two, but four Hoofs. Tailed like a Tortoise. (Or like a Hog, (f)(f) Solinus and others quoted by Bochart. which he also twists in the same manner) Head almost like an Ox. His Chaps wide. His Eyes small. His fore Teeth prodigiously great, being some of them ½ a foot round about, above ¼ of a foot long; as is evident in the Skull here preserved; and other particulars mention'd by Columna in his copious Description hereof.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

His Teeth, says Columna, are so hard, that being struck against Steel, produce sparks of fire. And thence concludes it probable, That this Animal, by striking his Teeth one against another, in the night time, might produce the like, and so seem, as it were, to vomit or breath out fire; a thing attributed to him by the Ancients. But the error of this Conjecture is double: First in his not considering, That the fire (could any be produced by striking Steel against these Teeth) would be struck not out of the Teeth, but out of the Steel. And next, In that, in truth, no fire can be produced by either striking of these Teeth one against another, or against Steel it self; as I have try'd.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SKELETON of a CROCODILE. Given by Sir Robert Southwell; to whom it was sent from the East-Indies. 'Tis about four yards and three quarters long. The Head about two feet. The Neck, from the hinder part of the Head, almost a foot and ½. The Trunk, from the fore-Ribs to the Tail, four feet. The Tail, seven. From the top of the Back to the Breast, a foot and ½ high.

The Orbites of the Eyes proportionably little; what ever Piso saith of his great Eyes.

The Articulations of the lower Jaw with the upper; and of the Occiput with the foremost Vertebra of the Neck; are here both made in the same manner, as in other Quadru peds: notwithstanding the Tradition of his moving the upper Jaw.

The Teeth are about threescore, thirty in each Jaw. All of them Claviculares, or Peg-Teeth, not much unlike the Tusks of a Mastiff; and scarce bigger: notwithstanding that Aristotle calls them great Teeth, οδοντας μεγαλδς. (a)(a) Hist. An. l. 2. c. 10. And yet, whereas a Dog hath but four Tusks, or exerted Teeth, in this Animal being all of that figure, their smallness, with respect to so great a Head, is fully compensated by their number. For the most part, those that are new and not worn, are toothed, like a small Saw, on their sides.

The Vertebræ, in all, sixty. Those of the Neck, are seven, as in a Man. The first whereof, in a Man called the Atlas, hath a Processus in the figure of the Epiglottis. The other six, have each one Processus or Prominent Part, which is long, broad, sharp, and upright: and two that are transverse, and short; to which are joyned, by a Cartilage, so many Ossa mucronata, one shorter than another from the Head toward the Trunk. But the Vertebræ, one lesser than another, from the Trunk towards the Head.

The Vertebræ of the Back, nineteen; that is, three sevens running one into another. Each of which hath three Prominent Parts, which are sharp, broad, and long; one perpendicular, and two that are transverse, or at right angles.

The Ribs 24, twelve on each side. Seven of which, have each of them double Cartilages, that is, one after another, appendent to them.

The fore part of the Sternum is plainly bony. The hinder part, cartilaginous; shaped like the Os Hyoides in a Man.

The Vertebræ of the Tail, are 34; or (if you add the last of the Trunk as common to both) 35; that is seven times seven. The first fourteen, have each three Prominent Parts, like those of the Vertebræ in the Back. The next nineteen, have only an upright Processus. The last of all, hath none. The first 14, are double, in number to those of the Neck, the next 19, are equal to those of the Back; the last answers to the Head. To all the Vertebræ of the Tail, except the last, are also subjoyned so many Ossa Mucronata, directly opposite to the upright Processus.

The Shoulder-Blades are two on each side; each ½ foot long.

The Bones of the fore-Foot, 27. The Thigh-Bone near a foot long; an inch and ¼ over. The Leg-Bones, two; each a little above ½ a foot long; and of equal thickness, sc. about ¼ of an inch over. The Foot strictly so call'd, the length of the Thigh. The Bones of the Pedium, four. The Fingers or Toes, five. The inmost, the thickest, like a Thumb. From thence, the third, the longest. The Bones of the Thumb, three; of the next Finger, four; of the next, five; of the two outmost, four; in all 20. All armed with black Claws, a little crooked, and not much above an inch long.

The Hip-Bones are three; each of them ½ a foot long.

The Bones of the hinder Foot, 24. The Thigh-Bone above a foot long, and an inch and ½ over. The Leg Bones almost eight inches long. The inmost, above an inch over; the other, but ½ an inch. The Foot, so called, the length of the Thigh. The Bones of the Pedium, four. The Toes, four; whereof the inmost, the greatest; the third, the longest. The Bones of the great Toe, three; of the next, four; of the third and fourth, five. The Claws somewhat bigger than in the fore-Foot.

Amongst other things worthy of note, the senselesness of the tradition of the Crocodiles moving his upper Jaw, is plain from the structure of the Bones, that is, the Articulation only of the Occiput with the Neck, and of the nether Jaw with the upper, as above said.

The first Author of it was Aristotle, in his Fourth Book de Partibus Animalium, Cap. 11. And thus much is true, not only of this Creature, but of all others, which have a long Head, and a wide Rictus, that when they open their Mouths, they seem to move both Jaws; as both the Viper, and the Lizard. And for the same reason, Columna (a) (a) Lib. de Aquatil. might say as much of the Hippopotamus, that he moves the upper Jaw, as the Crocodile. So all Birds, especially with long Bills, shew the contemporary motion of both the Mandibulæ; the Musculi splenii pulling back the Occiput, and so a little raising the upper, while the Musculi Digastrici pull the other down. But that this motion was not meant by Aristotle, appears in his First Book de Hist. Anim, c. 11. & lib. 3. c. 7. where he saith more plainly, That of all other Animals, only the Crocodile moveth the upper Jaw. So that he speaks of it, as a motion strange and peculiar; as if the upper Mandible did make an Articulation with the Cranium: contrary to what is here seen. And if we will hear Piso, who probably speaks Aristotle's meaning, as plainly as he doth his own, he goes further, and saith, (a) (a) Hist. N. lib. 5. That the Crocodile doth not only move his upper Jaw, but that his nether Jaw is immoveable. Than which Assertion, to one that hath any competent knowledge in Anatomy, and seeth the Head and lower Jaw of this Animal articulated in the same way, as in other Animals, nothing can appear more ridiculous.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The Parret only, saith Scaliger, (e) with the Crocodile, moves the upper Jaw: Yet the same is affirmed of the (e) Exercit. 236. S. 1. Hippopotamus, by Columna; of the Lizard, by Wormius; and of the Phænicopter, by Cardan. Which confirms what I have said under the Description of the Skeleton of a Crocodile, and in what sense it is absurdly said of them all. In their Cheeks, saith Piso, (f) (f) Hist. N. I. Occid. in each Nostril, and on the top of their Heads, in a certain Tumor, there lies, about August, a thick Worm; all which, in a little time, fall out of their own accord, without any sign left of their ever being there. They are a gregarious sort of Birds. (g) (g) Bart. 118. They breed very numerously in both the Indies. In Barbados, fly in flocks like Clouds. In Calechut they are forced (h) Gesner out of Ludov. Romanus. to set people to watch their Rice-Fields, least they should spoil them. (h) The flesh of their Chickens eats just like a Pigeon. (i)(i) Piso.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The smooth CAT-Fish. Pastinaca marina lævis. Fabius Columna, (a) (a) Lib. de Aq. & Terrest. hath described two Species of this kind: but both of them seem to be different from the Fish here. It is somewhat phantastically stuffed; yet I shall give the Description as well as it will admit.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SNAIL with the SPIKED TURBAN. Cochlea Turbine aculeato. This shell is described and figur'd by Fabius Columna. (a) (a) In his Purpura. But better in his Book de Aquat. & Terrestr. Yet in some things he hardly reaches it. The Mouth is a kind of long Oval. The right Lip is spread, and as it were doubled outward. The Back faced with smooth Plates like so many more lips, carry'd obliquely from the left Lip to the Turban, and there set with short but very sharp Spikes. The spaces betwixt these are ½ an inch broad, wrinkled with very small furrows, and curiously stained with pillars of white and brown lines meeting together in several Arches, as if it had been done by a Painter.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The PURPLE-WILK with long plated Spikes. Purpura Aculeis plicatis longissimis. By Ferranto Imperato, called Echinata. Olearius gives a good Figure, (a) (a) Tab. 29. fig. 1. Fab. Columna the Description, with the Title of Purpura muricata sive Murex Rostratus parvus. I will add my own a little fuller. The main Body is not much bigger than a good big Nutmeg. But hath a Horn no less than two inches and ½ long, near the Mouth ¼ of an inch over, and sharp-pointed. Almost a Pipe, but a little open underneath by the length. Along the right Lip and the Turban it self, in three Rows, stand several long sharp plated or gutter'd Spikes triangularly. But on the Turban they a little anticipate each other. As also do the Plates of the several Rounds. The right Lip is in some sort toothed, the left turned outward.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The PURPLE with REDOUBLED SPIKES, i. e. with the greater doubled Spikes collaterally subdivided into lesser. Of these there are four. Two of them white, described by Columna with the Name of Purpura sive Murex Pelagius marmoreus. Another, ash-colour'd; and a fourth, brown.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

All Purples have a Canale or Gutter'd Horn long or short, in which is lodged that part which is called the (b) Fab. Column. Purpura. Tongue; but performs the same Office as the Gills in other Fishes. (b) The Animal creeps and directs its own way with its Horns, like a Snail: yet hath it not four, but two only. (c)(c) Mart. Lyster de Cochl.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The Purple Tincture it yields, is contained betwixt that part which is called the Papaver and the Neck. (d) (d) Aristot. Hist. Anim. lib. 5. c. 15. It is of a different degree; in some, more upon the Red, like that of Cochinele; in others, more upon the Blew, like that of Violets. It was anciently (pressed out of the living (e)(e) Musæum Worm. Animal, and) used especially for the deying of Silks. But is now grown out of use, as is likely, from the great abundance of a sort of Fucus, which the Italians call Roccella, wherewith Silk-Dyers do now make very rich Purples of all varieties, with less labour and charge. (a)(a) Fab. Colum. Purpura.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The THIN-LIP'D WILK. The fore Corner of this ends in a gutter'd-Horn. Columna describes and pictures it with the Name of Bucciunm Rostratum. (b)(b) Lib. de Aquatil. & Terrest.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The WILK-SNAIL. Buccicochlea. So I call it, because, in Figure, it approaches to the Wilk; to the Common Snail, in the thinness of its shell. Columna (d) (d) Lib. de Aquat. & Terrest. describes and figures this with the Title of Buccinum exoticum variegatum.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The WHIRLE-SNAIL. Turbocochlea. The rounds of this sort wind from the Mouth to the right Hand, and that very obliquely, in number six, speckled with Chestnut spots in Rows. The Mouth very long, and one Lip ridged. 'Tis thin like a common Snail-shell. Columna (a) (a) Lib. de Aquat. & Terrest . describes and figures one pretty like this by the Name of Turbo alter minor.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SMALL WHIRL-SNAIL, with numerous rounds, and also winding from the Mouth toward the right Hand. There are about fifty of them in a Bottle. They are of a brown colour; and thin as the shell of the common Snail. Their Mouth almost round. The right Lip hath a little Angle. It hath nine rounds with very small transvers Striæ. Columna describes and figures one like this with the Title of Turbo Terrestris non descriptus. Mr. Lyster (b) (b) Lib. de Cochl. calls it Buccinum pullum; and very aptly compares it, both as to shape and bigness, to an Oat. He saith it is found in England in the Cracks of old Trees, and in Garden-walls.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SMOOTH SPIRE, with flat rounds. Here are also two sorts of these; the one furrow'd, the other not, described and figur'd by Columna under the title of Buccinum Persicum eburneum nitidum maculosum. Of all these here are several small Ones.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The SHORT WHIRLE. Trochus. This is somewhat more prolonged than some others of this kind, the Base broader, and the Rounds in a level. Of this sort here are two great Ones, curiously stained with Crimson waves from the Base (which is about four inches over) to the Cone. It is of kin to that which by Columna is called Turbo Persicus maximus.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SEMICIRCULAR MOUTH, TOOTHED on both sides. The Teeth of the outer Lip are the lesser; they stand not on the edge of the Lip, but deep in the Mouth, just over against the inner Lip: where the white parts of the shell on both sides are defined or circumscribed by a Circle, whose centre is at the edge of the inner Lip. Outwardly, the shell is speckled with white, red, and black Spots, and ruged with spiral wrinkles. One like to this is described by Columna with the Name of Cochlea marina marmorea.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The BUNCH-BACK'D VENUS-SHELL. Described and figur'd by Columna under the Name of Concha utroq; latere se colligens. It hath a transvers Angle or Ridge in the middle. Where also, there is a distinct piece, most closely inlaid into the Back of the Shell. The Lips also are both even.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The OVAL LIMPET, with very deep furrows round about. Whereby the edges also are very angular. The Seat of the Animal white. Columna (c) (c) Lib. de Aquat. & Terr. c. 50. seems to have described this by the Name of Lepas sive Patella maxima striata.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The FISTULAR OYSTER. Concha Valvis Fistulosis. Described by Columna with the name of Concha exotica margine in Mucronem emissa; who hath also figur'd it well. It hath not only several Furrows or Gutters reaching from the Navle to the edges round about, but the Furrows are also cover'd over, and so properly fistular; whence I have nam'd the Shell. The circumference or edg edge is also prolonged into several Peaks, which have some kind of likeness to Sword-points. But Columnas name is somewhat obsurdly given, unless instead of divers, there had been one only.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The FISTULAR OYSTER. Concha Valvis Fistulosis. Described by Columna with the name of Concha exotica margine in Mucronem emissa; who hath also figur'd it well. It hath not only several Furrows or Gutters reaching from the Navle to the edges round about, but the Furrows are also cover'd over, and so properly fistular; whence I have nam'd the Shell. The circumference or edg edge is also prolonged into several Peaks, which have some kind of likeness to Sword-points. But Columnas name is somewhat obsurdly given, unless instead of divers, there had been one only.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The MULTARTICULATE OYSTER, with a strait Base. Described and figur'd by Columna with the name of Concha πολυλεπτογίγί λυμο. Here are two of this sort. The chief marks hereof are, that it hath a great number (twenty or more) of slender Joynts, about ¼ of an inch long, placed parallel, upon a strait Base.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The GREAT WAVED-MUSCLE. Well described and figur'd by Columna with the Name of Concha Maxima marmorea exotica imbricata. It is also called Concha Tridachna: because it contains as much meat, as a Man can swallow at thrice. A certain number put for an uncertain: for some of them hold meat enough almost to fill a mans belly, being a foot in length, or rather in expansion or breadth; this here ¼ of a foot. The Back is waved with broad and deep Furrows, and the edges indented answerably. It is (c) (c) Bellonius. commonly found in the Red-Sea.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The FLAT CENTRE-SHELL. Balanus compressa. Commonly called the BARNACLE-SHELL; and CONCHA ANATIFERA. Because supposed to be the Egg of the Barnacle. And by some (b) (b) Hector Bœthius quoted by Gesner, and our Countryman Dr. Turner. it is confidently deliver'd, that in the Orcades there are certain Worms grow in Hollow-Trees, which by degrees obtain the Head, Feet, Wings and all the feathers of a Water-Fowl, which grows to the bigness of a Goose. Scaliger also describes this (supposed) Bird within this shell. (a) (a) Exercit. 59. toward the end. And with respect to so worthy a Person as Sir Robert Moray (who never meant to deceive) I my self was once induced to publish his Description of the same. (b) But having examined the Shell it self, I am of Opinion, (b) Philos. Transac. N 137. That all that is said of a Bird, is fabulous. Bartholine (c) would have it to belong to a kind of Cancellus. But I rather (c) Histor. Cent. 6. agree with Columna, that it is a sort of Centre-Shell; as being fixed in like manner upon it's Base, and composed of several shelly parts.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The ROOT of the Ægyptian ARUM. Described by Fabius Columna, (a) (a) Pars 2. c. 1. with the Name of Arum Ægyptiacum: but called by Alpinus, (b) Colocasia Strogulorhiza s. rotundâ Radice; not rightly, as Columna notes. Nor do either of (b) Rarior. Pl. lib. 2. c. 18. their Descriptions well reach it.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The ROOT of the Ægyptian ARUM. Described by Fabius Columna, (a) (a) Pars 2. c. 1. with the Name of Arum Ægyptiacum: but called by Alpinus, (b) Colocasia Strogulorhiza s. rotundâ Radice; not rightly, as Columna notes. Nor do either of (b) Rarior. Pl. lib. 2. c. 18. their Descriptions well reach it.
Inventarie of the Gabions, in M. George his Cabinet (1638) What shall I more say? if more you would have, I'le speake of these three hundreth souldiours brave,S. Johnston riband. Like these renown'd Lacedemonians, Couragious Thebans, valiant Thespians Resolv'd to die, led by Leonidas, Stop't Xerxes armie at Thermopylas. Such were these men who for Religions sake, A cord of hemp about their necks did take, Solemnly sworn, to yeeld their lives thereby, Or they the Gospels veritie deny: Quiting their houses, goods, and pleasures all, Resolv'd for any hazard might befall, Did passe forth of the town in armes to fight, And die, or they their libertie and light 51 Should lose, and whosoever should presume To turn away that cord should be his doome.