The Digital Ark: Early Modern Collections of Curiosities in England and Scotland, 1580-1700

[ Previous ][ Next ]

Conrad Gesner (1516 - 1565)

Swiss zoologist, botanist, and bibliographer. His five-volume Historiae animalium (1551–1558) is considered by some to be the beginning of modern zoology. Other biography: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conrad_Gesner Authority - early modern
Botanist
Relationships: Johann Bauhin (12 Dec 1541 -26 Oct 1613) was a travelling companion of Conrad Gesner
Linked print sources: as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Conradi Gesneri De rerum fossilium, lapidum et gemmarum maximè, figuris & similitudinibus liber.
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Conradi Gesneri medici Tigurini historiae animalium Lib. I de quadrupedibus viviparis; opus philosophis, medicis, grammaticis, philologis, poëtis, et omnibus rerum linguarumque variarum studiosis, utilissimum simul iucundissimumque futurum. .
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiæ animalium .
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Historiæ Animalium Liber IV, qui est de Piscium & Animalium Animantium Naturæ, 2nd ed..
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - Icones animalium quadrupedum viviparorum et oviparorum,.
as Author (in assoc. with a ms or print source) - The history of four-footed beasts and serpents describing at large their true and lively figure, their several names, conditions, kinds, virtues (both natural and medicinal) countries of their breed, their love and hatred to mankind, and the wonderful work of God in their creation, preservation and destruction: interwoven with curious variety of historical narrations out of scriptures, fathers, philosophers, physicians, and poets .
as Subject of/in a document - A collection within a collection: rediscovered animal drawings from the collections of Conrad Gessner and Felix Platter.
as Subject of/in a document - One Hundred and One Botanists.
References in Documents:
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 1 Loxia Gesn. Aldr. The shellaple or Crosse-Bill. Willough. Edit. Anglic. p. 248. Tab. 44. Crossbill. The Loxia of Gessner and of Aldrovandi. Willughby 1678, p. 248, tab. 44.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 2 Larus niger Gesn. Aldr. Tom. 30. pag. 81. Ein Brandvogel or Megvogelin Baltneri. The scare Crow of Y. shire. Will. p. 353. Black-backed Gull. The Larus niger of Gessner and of Aldrovandi 1599, bk. 30, p. 81; the Brandvogel or Megvogel of Baltner; The Scarecrow of Yorkshire. Willughby 1678, p. 353.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 8 Emberiza fl ava Gesn. Hortulanus Bellonij; Luteæ alterum genus Aldr. Chloreus s. Lutea Arist. Turneri. Willough. p. 268. T. 40. C The yellow Hammer. Yellowhammer. Emberiza flava of Gessner; Hortulanus of Belon; Lutea of another kind of Aldrovandi; the Chloreus or Aristotle's Lutea of Turner. Willughby 1678, p. 268, tab. 40.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 25 Pica Marina seu fratercula Gesn. Aldr. Tom. 3°. p. 215. Anas Artica Clusij. Willoughby. p. 325 T. 65. Puffin. Pica marina or Fratercula of Gessner; Aldrovandi 1599, bk. iii, p. 215. The Anas arctica of Clusius. Willughby 1678, p. 325, tab. 65.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 44 Tlauhgechul Mexiocanis Francisci Hernandez Aiaia Bras. Marggr. Lusitanis Colherado Will. p. 289. Plateæ s. Pelicani Gesn. Spec. Spoonbill. Tlauhquechul mexiocanis of Francisco Hernandez; the Aiaia brasiliensis of Marcgrav; the Colherado of the Portuguese. Willughby 1678, p. 289. A variety of the Platea or Pelican of Gessner.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 71. 72 Rostra Tlauhgechul MexiocanorũFranc. Hernandez Aiaiæ Bras. Margr. Will. p. 289. Lusitanis Brasiliæ incolis Colherado Plateæ s Pelicani Gesn. Spec. 25. 26 Beaks of the Mexican Tlauhquechul of Hernandez [1651]; the Brazilian Aiaia of [Piso and] Markgraf 1648, p. 204, and Willughby 1678, p. 289. The Portuguese inhabitants of Brazil call them Colherado plateae; a species of the Spoonbill or Pelican of Gessner.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 73 Plateæ s Pelicani Gesn. Leucorodijs [sive] Albardeolæ [Aldrovandi] Lepelaer Belgarum. Willugby. p. 288. T. 52. 27 Spoonbill. The Platea or Pelicanus of Gessner; the Leucorodius or Albardeola of Aldrovandi; the Lepelaer of the Dutch. Willughby 1678, p. 288, tab. 52.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 90 Crus cum unguibus Pygargi, Albicallæ S. Hinnulariæ Willugb. p. 61. An Crysaetos Gesn. Will. T. 1ma56 Leg of the White-tailed Eagle, with claws. The Pygargus, Albicilla or Hinnularia of Willughby 1678, p. 61; perhaps the Crysaetos of Gessner. Willughby 1678, tab. 1.
MS Book of the Principal of Brasenose College (MacGregor, ed.) 28 Acûs Arist. Spec altera major Gesn. Will. p. 159. T. J.25. ж. 2. quarum altera inter cæteros pisces, altera cum Hippocampis mox dixtis in Scrinio Dni D. Plot. The Acus of Aristotle. A species different to and larger than that described by Gessner. Willughby 1686, p. 159, tab. J25. Two of them, of which one is placed among the other fishes, the other with the Sea-horses. In Dr Plot's cabinet.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 22 Pectunculus echinatus. List. p. 188. Concha echinata Rond. Gesn. Aldr. Pectunculus with spines. Lister 1678, p. 188; the Concha echinata of Rondelet, Gessner and Aldrovandi.
MS Book of the Senior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 6 Musculus niger omniũcrassissimâ et ponderossimâ testâ List. Append. p. ij. Conchæ longæ spec. Gesn.Aldr. Black mussel, with the thickest and heaviest shell of all. Lister 1681, p. 11; a species of the Concha longa of Gessner and Aldrovandi.
Consolidated catalogue of 1695: The Book of the Junior Proctor (MacGregor, ed.) 13 Hieracites Gesneri. Nat. Hist. Oxõn. p. 95 Hawk-stone of Gessner. Plot 1677, p. 95.
MS Book of the dean of Christ Church (MacGregor, ed.) 103 Lycophthalmi sex 4 Gesneri. 103 d.2. Six [four] wolf's eyes of Gessner [two missing].
Petiver, Musei Petiveriani (1695-1703) A. * 130. Echinites Cretaceus compressus, verrucis eminentibus consitus. Found in the Chalk-pits neer Charlton, and call'd there Rings. N. B. Bellonius, Rondeletius, Gesner, Aldrovand, and most other writers of Natural History, have neither Figured these Serpents, Lizards, &c. well, nor described them clearly: so that I have chose rather to distinguish them here by short Descriptive Names, than to annex doubtful references to them.
Petiver, Gazophylacii Naturæ (1702-1706) 6. Sidereon sive Serpentaria mirabilis montana Kieg. Phyt. Curios. Fig. 213. Berg-Slangen Kruyd Belg. Munt. Herb. p. 751. cap. 330. This very odd Plant is said to grow on the Mountains of Stiria and Hungary. I suspect this Figure is too mach humored, and doubted whether there were such a Plant in Nature, until Dr. Sherard, that most accurate Botanist told me he saw a Design of it done by that Laborious Naturalist Conradus Gesner, amóngst the Figures of two Volums of Plants, being such he had observ'd growing about him. These are now in the Hands of Dr. John George Volkamer, Physician at Nurenberg: I shall be very much obliged to him or any other, who will be pleased to send me a Specimen of it.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

As to the first, I like not the reason which Aldrovandus gives for his beginning the History of Quadrupeds with the Horse; Quòd præcipuam nobis utilitatem præbeat. Being better placed according to the degrees of their Approximation, to Humane Shape, and one to another: and so other Things, according to their Nature. Much less should I choose, with Gesner, to go by the Alphabet. The very Scale of the Creatures, is a matter of high speculation.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) Two BLACK-BEAR CUBS. The Description of the Bear, see in Aldrovandus, Gesner, &c. The Anatomy, in the Philosophical Transactions N. 49., They breed most in Nova Zembla, and other of the more Northerly Countries. In Norway they hunt him, and so in Helvetia and Muscovy, and if he be fat, they account him a delicate Dish. (g) (g) Moufet, de Re Cibaria, & Musæum Worm.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (a) Quoted by Gesner.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The Leopard (and all of this kind) as he goes, always keeps the Claws of his fore-feet turned up from the ground, and sheath'd as it were in the Skin of his Toes, whereby he preserves them sharp for Rapine, extending them only, when he leaps at the Prey. See somewhat to this purpose in Gesner, out of Pliny.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (c) Gesner out of Paulus Venetus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The Tiger excels in swiftness; from whence he hath his Arabick Name, as well as the River call'd Tigris. As also in Fierceness: and yet in fondness and love to her Cubs; of which see divers instances in Gesner. An Impression which Nature hath stampt upon all Creatures, to secure the succession of Generation. They abound in Mexico, Brasile, and in the East Indies.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (a) Gesner out of Pomponius Sabinus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

See the Description of the Animal in Gesner, and others. His parts most remarkable, are those now described, and the Castor-Bag. His Anatomy see in the Philosophical Transactions, N. 49. Many strange Stories of his Ingenuity in Aldrovandus, Wormius, and others. He breeds in Italy, France, and other places: but our best Castor is from those of Russia. The great and principal use whereof inwardly, is in Hysterical and Comatose Cases.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (b) Gesner out of Olaus Magnus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (a) Gesner out of Solinus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (d) Gesner, out of Plutarch.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (a) Gesner, out of the Author of the Book, de Naturâ Rerum; out of Vincentius, Beluacensis, and Olaus Magnus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The MUSK DEER. Capreolus Moschi. Gesner reckoning up the Names, tells us, That the English call him a Musk Cat. But is better at other Languages. He breeds in China, and the East Indies. Not ill pictur'd in Calceolarius's Musæum. That in Kircher's China Illustrata faulty as to the Snout and Feet. That of Johnston absurd. Almost every where worse describ'd. That he is a two-horn'd Animal, says Aldrovandus, all agree, except Simeon Sethi, who saith he hath but one. Neither of which is true. The Description likewise given by Scaliger, and out of him by Chiocco in Calceolarius's Musæum is false, and very defective. The best I find is amongst the German Transactions. To which I would have refer'd the Reader, but that comparing it with That I had drawn up before I met with it, I see some differences.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HORNES of the SYRIAN GOAT; called Capra Mambrina 1.Syriaca being. Mambre, a Moun tain near Hebron; where about, chiefly, this Goat breeds. (a) (a) Gesner in his Paralypom. See Gesner's Description of him. And compare it with the Picture he gives, which seemeth to be the truer, as to the hornes. His Ears are so long, (b) as to reach almost to the ground. A sufficient supplement for the shortness of his hornes: being not above two inches and ½ long, and a little(b) Gesner ibid. crooked backward, almost like a Dogs Tooth.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The HORNES of the SYRIAN GOAT; called Capra Mambrina 1.Syriaca being. Mambre, a Moun tain near Hebron; where about, chiefly, this Goat breeds. (a) (a) Gesner in his Paralypom. See Gesner's Description of him. And compare it with the Picture he gives, which seemeth to be the truer, as to the hornes. His Ears are so long, (b) as to reach almost to the ground. A sufficient supplement for the shortness of his hornes: being not above two inches and ½ long, and a little(b) Gesner ibid. crooked backward, almost like a Dogs Tooth.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The HORNES of a HARE; so I find them inscribed. Although it is probable, that they are the hornes of a small kind of German Deer. Yet Wormius saith, There are horned-Hares in Saxony. See also Gesner of the same. Johnston gives the Picture, without a Descripton. This pair, once belonged to the Prince Elector of Saxony.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

Pausanias (cited by Gesner) affirms, and seems to speak it as a thing well known, That the Tusks of Elephants, which he calls, and useth arguments to prove them Horns, may, by the help of fire, like Cows horns, be reduced to any shape. Whether this be naturally twisted, or by art, I will not determine. Terzagi in Septalius's Musæum mentions though not a Spiral, yet strait Tusk of an Elephant, two yards high, and 160 pounds in weight.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The GREEN LIZARD. It was brought from the West-Indies. See the Description hereof in Gesner, and others.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SWAPTAIL LIZARD. Uromastix, vel Caudiverbera. Called also CORDILUS. In Calceolarius's Musæum there is a curious Picture hereof, under the Name of CROCODILUS TERRESTRIS. As also in Besler. Gesner, from Thomas Erastus, hath very copiously describ'd him, especially his Tail.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The greater SLOW-WORM; Cæcilia. Called also the BLIND-WORM; so commonly thought to be, because of the littleness of his Eyes. His Skin also is very smooth and glistering. His Teeth very small. Of a lighter colour than the Adder; which are his principal Notes. See the Descriptions of Gesner and Aldrovandus. The Female is Viviparous, as well as the Viper. Bellonius saith, that out of one, he hath taken above forty young ones.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (b) Gesner out of Paulus Ven.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (d) Gesner out of Pliny.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

Antonius Pigafeta was the first that brought this Bird, or any certain knowledge of him into Europe. (c) (c) Clusius. Before which, he was believed, not only by the Vulgar, but by Naturalists, (amongst whom Scaliger (d) See Exerc. 228. S. 2.(d) was one) that they had no Legs, but always flew up and down suspended in the Air, by the help of their Wings and Tail spread all abroad. According to which silly fancy, he is also pictur'd in Gesner.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (h) Gesner out of Ludov. Romanus.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The HEAD of the SHOVLER or SPOONBILL. The former Name the more proper, the end of the Bill being broad like a Shovel, but not Concave like a Spoon, but perfectly flat. The extremity of each Beak is a little hooked downward. And they are both made very rough within with numerous and crooked Striæ. A device of Nature, for the better holding of the Prey.

This Bird is of affinity with the Heron-kind, from which he scarce differs in any Part, saving the Bill. He feeds on Shell-fish. Wherewith having fill'd his Crop, he lets them lie there, till the heat of it makes them open: whereupon disgorging them, he picks the meat out of the Shells. Related by Gesner out of Aristotle, Ælian, and Cicero. (a)(a) Lib. 2. de Nat. Deorum.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The SOLUND GOOSE. Anser Bassanus. See the Description hereof in Gesner and Willughby. He is in bigness and Feather very like a tame Goose. But his Bill longer, and somewhat pointed, more like that of the Guilemot. His Wings also much longer, being two yards over. Near Colshill in Warwick-shire there was one found, Nov. 1669. (by some means fall'n on the ground) alive, not (a) Will. Orn. able to raise her self up again for the length of her Wings. (a) But they scarce breed any where except on the Rocks of the Island Bass in Scotland, (b) (b) Ibid from whence the Name.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

She hath this strange property, that she will swallow and disgorge again a great many Fishes, one after another; and at last, return with one (in her Crop) to her young Ones: related by Gesner from an observing Scot. It seems probable, that she trys which, of many will best agree with her own stomach, and when she finds one more delicate than the rest, she carries that to her Young. When they come to build, they bring so great a quantity of broken Wood with them, that the People there supply themselves from thence with as much as serves them for firing all the year. (a)(a) Gesner out of H. Boethius.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (a) Gesner out of H. Boethius.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (b) Gesner out of H. B. and Turner.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The MALE or WHITE SHARK. Canis Carcharias mas. See the Description hereof in Rondeletius. This is about two yards long, and near ¼ of a yard over, where thickest. But they are found sometimes seven or eight yards in length, and more. One hath been taken, saith Gesner, from an other person, near four thousand pounds weight. The sharpness and multitude of his Teeth especially, and the widness of his Mouth, are remarkable. They will often bite off the Legs or Arms of those that venture into the Sea in a Calm; and sometimes swallow them up whole. (a) (a) Ligon's Hist. of Barb. p. 5.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The VIVIPAROUS EEL-POUT. Mustela marina vivipara. (the Male, Lupus marinus Schonfeldii.) 'Tis well pictur'd by Adam Oleareus, (a) (a) Tab. 27. f. 2. who calls it a Sea-Wolf (Ein See-Wolf). As also by Johnston; but not described. But in Gesner's Paralypomena 'tis both figur'd and described by Ge. Fabritius under the Name of Klipfisch (i. e. Rock-Fish,) so called by the people near the Baltick (where he breeds.) Fabritius is particular only as to the Teeth, and is also mistaken in some things. I shall therefore add the Description I drew up before I met with his.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The Sturgeon is taken in most great Rivers, as well as in the Sea. He hath sometimes been seen, saith Bellonius, six yards long. The bigger he is, as all other Fish, the better meat. The Italians (c) (c) Salvian. prefer the Belly before the Jole. His Liver very delicate. At Hamburge and Dantsick they eat (or did in Moufet's time, who reports it, eat) Sturgeon roasted. In the same Author, see a most excellent Pickle for this Fish. The Eggs being salted and made up into a Mass, were first brought from Constantinople by the Italians, and called Caveare. Of the way of making it, see Gesner. The pickled pieces made of the Chine, are by some called Schinalia. Of the long Bag (d) (d) Salvian. which grows next the Chine, the people that live near Tanais make Glew.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The BEARDED-LOACH or GROUNDLING. Gobites Barbatula. It is a small fish about five inches long, bearded with six small Threads, three on each side. Yet Bellonius mentions but four. Nor doth Gesner picture more in his corrected figure. See them both.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

MOTHER OF PEARL, with the backside cover'd all over with those little Shells called DENTALIA, as having some little likeness to Teeth: that is to say, White, Smooth, Conick, and bended Tubes, which grow to this and other Shells. See Gesner of Entali & Dentali, p. 940. The inside of the Sea-Ear, of some sorts of Limpets, and of divers other Shells, are commonly sold in Shops for true Mother of Pearl.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) (b) Hector Bœthius quoted by Gesner, and our Countryman Dr. Turner.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) The PAPYR-REED of Nile. Papyrus Nilotica. By the Ægyptians called Berd. Given by Sigr. Boccone, who brought it out of Sicily, where it grew. Described and figur'd in Bauhinus; (b) (b) Lib. 18. c. 196. who with Gesner, makes it a Species of Cyperus, to which (in Leaf and Stalk) it is like; but hath a more compacted Head. This seems to have been no tall Plant: but upon its Native Bed, sc. near the Banks of the River Nile, it grows above three yards high, (as high, saith Alpinus, above the Water) and abundantly. Which Moses's Mother knowing, chose well, to lay her Babe in Pharaohs Daughter's way, yet, in the mean time, under good shelter from the scorching Sun.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685) A FIFTH, a small one, and having a little flinty Stone (c) De figur. Lapid. c. 3. growing to the middle of it on both sides. This particularly resembling Gesner's Ombrias. (c) Or the Stone sent him by the Name of Lapis Hyæniæ. (d)(d) Ibid. c. 12.
Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

The STELENTROCHITE. By some, called STELECHITES: Entrochites, by most. But, in proper speaking, distinct from both. For it is not only of a Cylindrical Figure, or near it, and containeth a softer substance in the Centre, answerable to a Pith: and also radiated as the Branch of any Tree cut transversly. But moreover con (b) De Lapid. Figur.sisteth of several flat round Joynts like little Wheels, evenly pil'd, and, with the said Rays, mutually indented, so as altogether to make a Cylinder. Described also by Gesner, (c) De Lap. & Gem. (b) Boetius, (c) Ambrosinus, (d) and others. But we have two Accounts hereof given us in the (d) Aldrov. Mus. Metall. Philosophical Transactions, far more accurate and particular, than is elsewhere extant. The former, by Mr. Lyster; (e) (e) Num. 100. with between thirty and forty Figures of their Varieties, with some other Congenerous Stones. The latter, by Mr. John Beaumont (f) (f) Num. 129. Junior; who hath added the Description of some more Diversities. And the manner of their growth. In this Musæum are several Species, which I shall here enumerate.

Grew, Musaeum Regalis (1685)

Another sort of Toad-Stone, semiglobular, and solid, sc. with a flat base, is described by Gesner. (b) (b) Lib. de Lap. Fig. Thus far of Stones more Round. I shall next describe those which are Cylindrick, or near that Figure. And first the Osteocolla, of which here are several Species.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)

3. A not ordinary sangui-suga or Leech. found sticking fast in the fish called Xiphias or Sword-fish, slightly mention'd by Gesner in his book de Aquatilibus, and Johnston in his book de Piscibus. Our presenter gives it the name of Hirudo or Acus caudâ utrinque pennatâ, because of its working it self into the flesh, and sucking the blood of the said Fish. He describes it to be of about four inches long; the belly of it white, cartilagi (6160) nous and transparent; without eyes or head (that he could observe,) but in stead of a head, it hath a hollow snout encompassed with a very hard membrane, differing in colour and substance from the belly; which snout it thrusts whole into the body of the fish, (as strongly as an auger is wound into a piece of wood,) and fills it full of blood unto the very orifice. It hath a tail shaped like a feather, serving for its motion, and, under it, two filamenst or slender fibres, longer than the whole Insect, whereby, it seems, it clings about stones or herbs, and sticks the closer in the body of the Sword-fish; of which it attacks those parts only, where the fins of the fish cannot touch or trouble it; the Observer affirming, that he hath often found it sticking in the back and in the belly, and sometimes close to the head, sometimes close to the tail of that fish, but always far enough from the fins. Within its belly he noted some vessels, like small guts, reaching from one end of it to the other, which by the pressure of his nail he made reach to the orifice of the snout, whence they retired back of themselves to their natural scituation; they seeming to be the instruments for sucking the blood, because the snout is in it self an empty part, destitute of fibres and valves to draw and suck with; whereas these vessels have a motion resembling that of a pump, in which the snout of this animal serves for a sucker, drawing the blood from end to the other: And the belly of this Insect being framed ring-wise, the structure serves to thrust the said inner vessels unto the orifice of the trunk, and to draw them back again. This creature as it torments the Swordfish, so it is, by our bservers relation, vexed it self by another Insect, which he calls a Lowse, of an ash colour, fastened towards the tail of this Leech as fermly, as a sea-snail is to a rock. 'Tis of the bigness of a pea, and hath an opening, whence come out many small winding and hairy threds. It hath not been observed, (as far as our Author could learn,) to trouble, or to be upon, any other animal than this Leech.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)
A Letter of Mr. Martin Lister, containing his Observations of the Astroites or Star-stones; communicated to the Publisher Jan. 19. 167¾. SIR,

You are pleased to tell me, that my Notes concerning certain Stones figured like Plants, found in the * See N. 100. of these Tracts. mountains of Craven, were well received*. This encourages me to give you the trouble of what I have observ’d of the Astroites; which are stones also pointed like the other, but not found, that I know of, in the same Rocks. And we must cross the plain Country, and seek for them hard under the Yorkshire Woolds: For, what store I could procure of them, were brought me from Bugthorp and Leppington. At the former place, my self have seen them dugg out of a certain blew clay on the banks of a smal rivulet, betwixt the Town and the foot of the Woolds. There are plenty of them washed into the brook; but the most fair and solid are those we get out of the Clay.

I pretend not, to discover to you their Original, no more than I did of the Entrochi; but having used some diligence in causing the places, where they are found, to be a litle more searched than 275 is usual, I was by that means furnish't with a good quantity of them; which gave me the opportunity to make the following Observations What light may be hence had, I leave tomore judicious persons, acknowledging my self at present not to be able to demonstrate (if they are not Stones of their own kind,) what they have been before petrification.

It is very litle and inconsiderable, what any Author, that I have yet seen, hath said of them; save a very brief description of them in Gesner and the like in Wormius; in the rest, all is transcribed.

The Matter and substance of these Stones, is broken, is slint-like, of a dark shining politure; but much softer, and easily corroded by an acid Menstruum. Vinegar, indeed, makes them creep; but a stronger spirit, as of Niter, tosses them. I doubt not, but they will readily calcine, as the Blemnites, to a very strong and white Lime.

These Stones (as we now find them) are all Fragments; as we have noted of the Entrochi: Either one single joint, or 2, 3, or more joints set together, making a pentagonous Cylindrical figure or five-sided column. And I have not yet had any piece much above one inch long, which consisted of 18 joints; but I have seen one piece, somewhat shorter than the former, which had 25 joints. These last thin-jointed pieces are quite of a different make, as to all circumstances, from the other, as will appear.

Every joint consists of 5 Angles, which are either drawn out and sharp, and consequently the sides of pieces, made up of such joints, are deep-channeled; (and this is the condition of some of the thick-jointed pieces, as well as of all the thin-jointed ones;) or the Angles are blunt and round, and the sides plain or very litle hollowed. There are as big, and as smal pieces of this sort, as of any other more sharp-angled; and therefore I account them a 3d. species og Star-stone. And of this sort was, I guess, that piece which Wormius describes; which therefore, he saith, is more like the blown Flower of Pentaphyllum, than a Star. Besides, the manner of the engraving of the joints in every one of the 3 respective species is also very different, as will be declared.

Where the joints are thin or deep, they are so equally throughout the whole piece; yet are there some, but very few, exceptions to this also, of pieces which consist of joints of unequal thick 276 ess. Many of the thick-jointed pieces have certain joints a thought broader, or a very litle (landing out at the Angles, and thereby the joints are distinguish'd into certain Conjugations of 2, 3, or more joints: And these Conjugations are very observable in the thin-jointed stones, and are marked out with a sett of Wyers; of which by and by.

The thickest piece, which hath yet come to my hands, is not above one inch and a half about, and those very rare too: From which size to that of a smal pin, I have all the intermediat proporonsproportions; and these so exceeding smal pieces are as exactly shaped, as the greatest. Most pieces, if not all, of any considerable length, are not straight, but visibly bent and inclining. All the pieces of any sort are much of an equal thickness, or but litle tapering; yet one of the ends, by reason of a Top joint, is visibly the thickest.

This Top joint hath 5 blunt Angles, and is not hatched or engraven, or but very faintly, on the outside. Every joint else of a piece (save the top-joint) is an Intaglia, and deeply engraven on both sides alike; and will accordingly serve for a Seal. The middle of each angle is hollow, and the edges of the angles are thick furrowed: The terminations of these hatchings are the indented sutures, by which the joints are set together; the ridges of one joint being alternately let into the furrows of the other next it. The Hatchings of the flat-sided pieces are in circular lines; but of the other two species, they are straight lines, or near the matter.

In the very center of the 5 angles is a smal hole, conspicuous in most joints. Note also, that in the middle of each joint, betwixt angle and angle; in the very suture, is another such like smal pinhole very apparent, if the stones be first well scoured.

Besides all the former particulars, there may be observ’d, in the deep-jointed pieces, just under the top-joint, above described, the Vestigia of certain Wyers rather than branches; and sometimes 2, 3, or more of the joints of the Wyers yet adhering. These Wyers are ever five in number, viz. one in the middle or hollow part betwixt angle and angle. Again, in thin jointed pieces there are ever five of these Wyers, or a sett of them inserted into every conjugation of joints; so that it were some representation of the thing, to imagine the stalk of Asperula or Equisetum. Also I have seen, but that very rarely, (not in one piece amongst 500,) a sett of 277 Wyers in the middle of a deep-jointed piece. One thin-jointed piece I have by me, where a Wyer of 20 joints and upwards (and how much longer they may be, I know not,) lyes double within the hollow side, and by that accident was preserved in its natural place. Further, some lumps of Quarry I have from the same place above-nam’d, where the Wyers as well as the Stones themselves are seen in long pieces. It is no wonder, that these Wyers are knocked off, and but very rarely found adhering to the Stones they belong to, being very small and slender, of a round figure and smooth-jointed, being sett together per harmoniam and not indented suture. Nothing that I can think of, is so like these Wyers, as the antennæ of Lobsters. Lastly, some of these Wyers are knotted, and others of them fairly subdivided or branched.

I have, by the assistance of Mr. Lodge, illustrated all these particulars with Figures: Of which this is the Explication;* *See Tab.2.

1. The Top-joint of an Astroites figur'd on both sides; on the one it is deep engraven, on the other the hatches are scarce viable. Also the ends of the 5 Angles are very blunt. 2. A second or sharp-angled joint with fair hatchings on both sides. 3. A piece with very narrow and sharp angles. Also the Top- joint designed, as it naturally appears smooth and without hatchings. 4. A round-angled joint. 5. A flat-sided piece; where the hatchings are somewhat Circular. 6. A thin-jointed piece: Where note also, that the angles are much narrower, and of a protracted Oval figure. 7. The biggest piece I have yet seen. Note also its bending. 8. The smallest piece I have yet met with. 9. The longest piece; where every 4th joint is a thought bigger or more prominent than the rest; as in the 7th fig. also is well designed. 10. A large and round-angled or flat-sided piece; to which belongs that single joint noted fig. 4. 11. A flat or not hollow-sided piece; of which sort also is the 5th figure: The 10th and 4th not much differing. 12. A thin-jointed piece; where the conjugations are marked 278 out by the vestigia of the several sets of Wyers or branches. 13. A piece where the joints are un-equal in thickness. 14. A piece with seme part of the Wyers yet adhering in their natural order at the biggest end of the piece. 15. A thin-jointed piece; where note on the left side a single Wyer accidentally preserved in its natural place, though snapt asunder. 16. A thick-jointed piece with a set of Wyers in the middle of it. 17. A good long piece of a Wyer, and a single joint thereof.

So far Mr. Lister: To which we cannot but add Mr. Rays Notes upon these very Observations.

I was much taken, (saith he to Mr. Lister) with your Observatiions concerning the Star-stones, and inform’d in several particulars. For, although I had often seen, and my self also sometimes gather’d of those bodies; yet I did never curiously note the texture, parts and differences of them. As for their Original, if you can allow the Trochites and Entrochi to have been fragments of Rock-plants, I see not, why you should make any difficulty of admitting these to have been so too; the several internodia being alike thin in both, and the Commissures not much different; only the external figure doth not correspond. But it is to be considered, that many of the Trochites have a pentagonous hole in the middle of them, which is we admit for the receptacle of the pith, it will be as hard to exemplifie such a figur’d pith, as such a figur'd stalk in Land-plants. Your note concerning the Wyers springing out of the furrows or concave angles of some of the internodia, and encircling the stalk like the leaves of asperula or equisetum, was surprising; and seems to me to argue these bodies to belong to the genus of Vegetables; no less than Coral, Coralline, and the several sorts of Pori; some of which are also jointed: But no vegetable, either of Land or Sea, that I know of, hath such frequent joints and short or thin iternodia; and so they are things of their own kind, whose species is, for ought we know, lost. Is they were Vegetables, I guess they were never soft; but grew upon the rocks like Coral, and the other Stone-plants, just now mention'd; hard as they are.

As for Equisetum, we know, that the Leaves of some sorts of it are jointed, as well as the Stalk: Else I know no plant that hath jointed leaves; except some sorts of Rush-grass, though those bristles of equisetum surrounding the stalk, neither these reputed leaves of Rush-grass, can properly be call’d Leaves, being round, and having no difference of upper and lower superficies. Now that I have upon this occasion mention'd equisetum, give me leave to mind you of what I have already publish'd to the world; That I have found, on the banks of the river Tanar in Piedmont, plenty of the fragments of the stalks of equisetum perfectly petrified, with litle or no increase of bulk, so exactly like the plant, that all the striæ did all along clearly appear. The colour of these petrified stalks was white.

Selections from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1665-1669)
(489) II. A Discourse concerning the Large Horns frequently found under Ground in Ireland, Concluding from them that the great American Deer, call'd a Moose, was formerly common in that Island: With Remarks on some other things Natural to that Country. By Thomas Molyneux, M. D. Fellow of the King and Queens Colledge of Physicians in Ireland, and of the Royal Society in England.

THThat no real Species of Living Creatures is so utterly extinct, as to be lost entirely out of the World, since it was first Created, is the Opinion of many Naturalists; and ’tis grounded on so good a Principle of Providence taking Care in general of all its Animal Productions, that it deserves our Assent. However great Vicissitudes may be observed to attend the Works of Nature, as well as Humane Affairs; so that some entire Species of Animals, which have been formerly Common, nay even numerons in certain Countries; have, in Process of time, been soperfectly lost, as to become there utterly unknown; tho’ at the same time it cannot be denyed, but the kind has been carefully preserved in some other part of the World.

Of this we have a remarkable Example in Ireland, in a most large and stately Beast, that undoubtedly has been frequent in this Kingdom, tho’ now clear (490) ly extinct; and that so many Ages past, as there remains among us not the least Record in Writing, or any manner of Tradition, that makes so much as mention of its Name; as that most Laborious Inquirer into the pretended Ancient, but certainly Fabulous History of this Country, Mr. Roger O Flaherty, the Author of Ogygia, has lately informed me.

What Discoveries therefore we make of this Creature, we can only have from those loose parts of it we find dug out of the Earth by Accident, preserved there so many Ages from Corruption, by lying deep and close under Ground, whilst harder and of themselves more durable Bodies, moulder away and perish, by being exposed to the various Changes of the Air, and repeated Injuries of the Weather.

By the Remains we have of this Animal, it appears to have been of the Genus Cervinum or Deer Kind, and of that sort that carries Broad or Palmed Hornes, bearing a greater affinity with the Buck or Fallow Deer, than with the Stag or Red Deer, that has Hornes round and branched, without a Palme; This I lately observed, having an opportunity of particularly Examining a compleat Head, with both its Horns entirely perfect, not long since dug up, given to my Brother William Molyneux, as a Natural Curiosity by Mr. Henry Osborn, that lives at a place call'd Dardistown, in the County of Meath, about Two Miles from Drogheda, who writ him the following Account of the manner and place they were found in.

I have by the Bearer sent the Head and Horns I promised you; this is the third Head I have found by casual trenching in my Orchard; they were all dug up (491) within the Compass of an Acre of Land, and lay about four or five Foot under Ground, in a sort of Boggy Soil. The first Pitch was of Earth, the next two or three of Turff, and then followed a sort of white Marle, where they were found: They must have lain there several Ages, to be so deep enterred. (Thus far Mr. Osborn.)

I took their Dimensions carefully as follows; from the extreme tip of the right Horn, to the extreme tip of the left, as exprest in the annext Table, Figure the first. by the prick’t Line A. B. was ten Foot ten Inches, from the tip of the right Horn, to the Root where it was fastned to the Head, Exprest by the Line C. D. five Foot two Inches from the Tip of the highest Branch (measuring one of the Horns transverse, or directly across the Palme) to the tip of the lowest Branch, exprest by the Line G. F. Three Foot Seven Inches and a Half. The length of one of the Palms within the Branches, exprest by the Line G. H. Two Foot Six Inches: The breadth of the same Palm, still within the Branches, exprest by the Line I. K. One Foot Ten Inches and a half: The Branches that shot forth round the edge of each Palm, were Nine in Number, besides the Brow Antlers, of which the right Antler, exprest by the Line D. L. was a Foot and Two Inches in length, the other was much shorter: The Beam of each Horn at some distance from the Head, where ’tis mark’d M. was about Two Inches and Six tenths of an Inch, in Diameter, or about Eight Inches in Circumference; at the Root where it was fastned to the Head, about Eleven Inches in Circumference. The length of the Head, from the back of the Skull to the tip of the Nose, or rather the extremity of the upper Jaw-bone, exprest in the Figure by the Line N. O. Two Foot, (492) the breadth of the Skull where largest, mark'd by the Line P.Q. was a Foot.

The Two Holes near the Roots of the Horns, that look like Eyes were not so, (for these were placed on each side the Head in Two ample Cavities, that could not be well exprest in the Figure) but were large open Passages, near an Inch in Diameter in the Forehead Bone, to give way to great Blood-vessels, that here issue forth from the Head, and pass between the Surface of the Horn, and the smooth Hairy Skin that Covers them whilst they are growing, (which is commonly call’d the Velvet) to supply the Horns with sufficient Nourishment, while they are soft, and till they arrive at their full Magnitude, so as to become perfectly hard and solid. These Vessels, by reason of their largeness and great turgency of the Humor in them; whilst the Horn is sprouting and pliant, make deep and conspicuous furrows all along the outside of it where they pass; which may plainly be seen after the Horn is bare and come to its full growth; at which time all these Veins and Arteries, with the outward Velvet Skin, drying by the Course of Nature, shrivel up and separate from the Horn, and the Beast affects tearing them off in great stripes against the Bows of Trees, exposing his Horns naked, when they are throughly hardned, without any Covering at all. This I gather, by what Remarks I have made on the Skulls of other Deer, and what I have observed concerning the growth of these sort of Horns in Animals of the like kind, tho' not in this particular sort of Creature.

The Figure I had exactly taken by a skilful Hand, to shew truly the right shape and size of these kind of (493) Horns we so commonly find here under Ground in Ireland; and have likewise added a Draught of a pair of common Stags Horns, exprest Figure the 2d. and another of a pair of common Bucks Horns, exprest Figure the 3d. all done according to the same Scale; that by this means, at one and the same time, may appear the grand disproportion between these sorts of Heads, and also the difference and agreement in their Shape. (See the Table.)

Such then were the vast Dimensions, according to which the lofty Fabrick of the Head and Horns of this stately Creature was Built; and doubtless all the rest of the parts of its Body answered these in a due proportion. So that should we compare the fairest Buck with the Symetry of this mighty Beast, it must certainly fall as much short of its Proportions as the smallest young Fawn, compared to the largest over-grown Buck.

And yet ’tis not to be question’d, but these spacious Horns, as large as they were, like others of the Deer Kind, were naturally cast every Year, and grew again to their full Size in about the Space of Four Months: For all Species of Deer, yet known, certainly drop their Horns yearly, and with us ’tis about March, and about July following they are full summ'd again. Of which strange Appearance in Nature, the learned Gerrardus Johannes Vossius making mention in his excellent Book De Idololatriâ, Lib. 3. Cap. 57. has these Words: Ponam inter Naturæ maximè admiranda breviculo adeo Tempore tam solida duraq; tantæ Molis Cornua enasci (a). (a) That is, I shall reckon it among the most wonderful Works of Nature, that Horns so hard and solid, and of so great a Bulk, should grow up in so short a time. (494) And the inquisitive Italian Philosopher, Francisco Redi, in his Experimenta circa res Naturates, &c. on the same Occasion expresses himself thus: Maximâ profecto admiratione dignum est tantam Molem Cornuum & Ramorum tam brevi tempore quotannis renasci & crescere (b). And if these judicious Persons were moved thus with Admiration by considering only the yearly Falling and sudden Growth of these smaller Horns of Bucks and Stags, with which alone they were acquainted, what would they have thought, had they known of these vast and stupendious Productions of Nature in the same Kind.

As there seems to me no small Affinity or Agreement in the Sprouting forth, and Branching of Deers Horns, with the way of Growth in Vegetables; so I conceive likewise the constant yearly dropping of them, to proceed much from the same Cause, that Trees annually cast their ripe Fruit, or let fall their withering Leaves in Autumn: that is, because the nourishing Juice, say it is Sap or Blood, is stopt and flows no longer; either on the account ’tis now deficient, being all spent, or that the cavous Passages which conveigh it, dry up and cools; so as the Part having no longer any Communication with, must of necessity by degrees sever from the Whole; but with this Difference, that Horns by reason of their hard Material and strong Composition, stick fast to the Head by their Root, Seven or Eight Months after all their Nourishment perfectly retires; whereas Leaves and Fruit, consisting of a much more tender Substance and a finer Texture of Parts, drop sooner from their native (b) That is, Truly it deserves our greatest Wonder that so large a Body of Horns and Branches should sprout up in so short a time, and be renewed every Year. (495) Beds where they grew, when once the Supply of usual Nourishment is stopt; this Analogy that Nature observes in casting the Horns of Beasts and dropping the Fruit of Trees, will appear much more evident to any one that will observe the end of a Stalk, from which a ripe Orange or any such large Fruit has been lately sever’d, and the Butt end of a cast Horn where it fasten'd to the Os Frontis: for by comparing them together, he shall find so great a Congruity in the shape of both, that ’twill be apparent Nature works according to the same Mechanism in one as in t’other.

Discoursing one Day with his Excellency the Lord Capell, then one of the Lord Justices of Ireland, an experienc’d and accurate Observer of the Works of Nature, I chanced to mention these Large Horns: He was very earnest to see them, and so mightily surpris’d at the sight of their extraordinary Bulk, that my Brother thought fit to make a Present of them to his Lordship, which he obligingly accepted; resolving to send them over, as he said, to his Majesty King William.

Such another Head, with both the Horns intire was found some Years since by one Mr. Van Delure in the County of Clare, buried Ten Foot under Ground in a sort of Marle, and were presented by him to the late Duke of Ormond, then Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, who valued them so highly for their prodigious largeness, that he thought them not an unfit Present for the King, and sent them for England to King Charles the Second, who ordered them to be set up in the Horn-Gallery at Hampton Court; where they may still be seen among the rest of the large Heads both of Stags and Bucks that adorn that Place, but this so vastly exceeds the largest of them, that the rest appear to lose much of their (496) Curiosity by being viewed in Company with this. I am lately informed, these with the other Heads are since removed to the Guard-Room out of the Horn- Gallery.

In the Year 1691., Major Folliot told me, that digging for Marle near the Town Ballymackward, where he lives, not far from Ballyshannon in the County of Fermanagh, he found buried Ten Foot under plain solid Ground, a Pair of these sort of Horns, which he keeps still in his Possession.

In the Year 1684., there were Two of these Heads dug up near Turvy, the Mansion Seat of the Lord Barnevall, within Eight Miles of Dublin; that which was most compleat of the Two was fixt over the Chimney in the Publick Hall; and there still remains as an ancient and lasting Curiosity to future Ages.

Not long since, a Head of this Kind with its Horns was found near Portumny, the House of the Earls of Clanricard, seated on the River Shannon, in the County of Gallway, where it is carefully preserved, and still admired by all that view it.

Such a Forehead with Two extraordinary Beams of these Kind of Horns, may be now seen fastened against one side of the Common Hall of his Grace Michael Lord Archbishop of Ardmagh's House here in Dublin; they are both imperfect and want their Palmes, yet by the vast thickness and length of the Beams, I judge when entire they much exceeded the Size of those I have given the Dimensions of above. The Primate told me, they were found somewhere in the Province of Ulster, (497) and presented to the Earl of Essex, then Governor of Ireland, who gave them his Grace.

To these I should add many more Instances of the like, as those found by the late Lord Mountjoy, near his House at Newtown-Stewart; and those kept at Stockallen in the County of Meath, for to my Knowledge within less than Twenty Years, above Twenty, I might safely say, Thirty Pair of these sort of Horns have been dug up in several places of this Country, all found by Accident; and we may well suppose vast Numbers still remain undiscovered, but to mention any more of them particularly would be tedious, and to little purpose, since these may suffice plainly to shew, this Creature was formerly Common with us in Ireland; and an Indigenous Animal, not peculiar to any Territory or Province, but universally met with in all parts of the Kingdom.

For if we draw a Line through the several Places of this Island where these Heads have been found, viz. the County of Clare, the County of Dublin, and the County of Farmanagh, omitting those other parts I have mentioned, we shall make a Triangle whose shortest Side will be in length above an Hundred English Miles, which is near as large a Figure of this Sort, as we can well describe in the Map of Ireland.

And besides, we may reasonably, I think, gather; That they were not only common in this Country, but by what Mr. Osborn mentions in his Letter to my Brother, That they were a Gregarious Animal, as the Naturalists call them, or such a sort of Creature as affect naturally keeping together in Herds; as we see the Fallow Deer with us, and as 'tis reported of the Elches in (498) Sweden, and the Rain Deer in the Northern Countries of Europe; for otherwise we cannot easily fancy it should happen; that Three of their Heads should be all found within the narrow Compass of one Acre of Ground.

That these and several others, and indeed I think I may say, all that I have been particularly informed of, though dug up in far distant Places of Ireland, should be constantly found buried in a Sort of Marle, seems to me to intimate, as if Marle was only a Soil that had been formerly the Outward Surface of the Earth, but in process of Time, being covered by degrees with many Layers of Adventitious Earth, has by lying under Ground a certain Number of Ages, acquired a peculiar Texture, Consistence, Richness, or Maturity that gives it the Name of Marle. For of necessity we must allow the Place where these Heads are now found, was certainly once the external Superfice of the Ground; otherwise ’tis hardly possible to suppose how they should come there.

And that they should be so deep buried as we at present find them, appears to have happen’d, by their accidentally falling where it was soft low Ground; so that the Horns by their own considerable Gravity might easily make a Bed where they setled in the yielding Earth; and in a very long Course of Time, the higher Lands being by degrees dissolved by repeated Rains, and washt and brought down by Floods, covered those Places that were scituated lower with many Layers of Earth: For all high Grounds and Hills, unless they consist of Rock, by this means naturally lose a little every Year of their Height; and sometimes sensibly become lower even in one Age; of which we may see several satisfactory Instances related by Dr. Plott in his (499) Natural History of Staffordshire, Chap. 3. Page 113. as for all such Heads that might chance to fall on high or hard Grounds, where they could not possibly be covered or defended, these must of necessity rot, perish, and be destroyed by the Weather: And for this Reason it is, that never any of these Horns are discovered in such sort of Ground, but always in a light Soil, and in some low Part of the Country.

By what means this Kind of Animal, formerly so common and numerous in this Country, should now become utterly lost and extinct, deserves our Consideration: and seeing it is so many Ages past, that we have no manner of Account left to help us in our Enquiry, the most we can do in this Matter is to make some probable Conjectures about it; I know some have been apt to imagine this like all other Animals might have beeen destroyed from off the Face of this Country by that Flood recorded in the Holy Scripture to have happened in the the time of Noah; which I confess is a ready and short way to solve this Difficulty, but does not at all satisfy me: For (besides that that there want not Arguments, and some of them not easily answer’d, against the Deluge being Universal) if we consider what a fragil, slight and porous Substance these and the Horns of all Deer are, we can't well suppose they could by any means be preserv’d entire and uncorrupt from the Flood, now above Four Thousand Years since; and I have by me some of the Teeth, and one of the lower Jaw-bones of this Creature so perfect, solid, ponderous and fresh, that no one that sees them can possibly suspect they could have been in nature so many Ages past: And therefore it seems more likely to me, this kind of Animal might become extinct here from a certain ill Constitution of Air in (500) some of the past Seasons long since the Flood, which might occasion an Epidemick Distemper, if we may so call it, or Pestilential Murren, peculiarly to affect this sort of Creature, so as to destroy at once great Numbers of 'em, if not quite ruine the Species.

And this is not so groundless an Assertion as at first it may appear, if we consider this Island may very well be thought neither a Country nor Climate so truly proper and natural to this Animal, as to be perfectly agreeable to its temper; since for ought I can yet learn it neither is, nor ever has been an Inhabitant of any of the adjacent Kingdoms round about us. And besides, the Three Heads above mentioned, found so close to one another in the County of Meath, and the Two near Turvy, seems not a little to countenance this Opinion; as if these Animals dyed together in Numbers, as they had lived together in Herds.

To this purpose I have met with a remarkable Passage in Scheffer's Description of Lapland, Chap. 28. speaking of the Cervus Rangifer, an Animal that agrees in Kind with ours, though it be a quite different Sort of Deer, he says that whole Herds of them are often destroy’d by a Raging Distemper common among them; these are his Words: Est & Morbis suis genus hoc Obnoxium qui si ingruant Gregem totum solent pervagare & ad necem dare; qua de re Johannes Bureus ita habet in Schedis suis, solet interdum Rangiferos morbus quidam velut Pestis invadere sic ut moriantur omnes Lappoq; compellatur novos sibi comparare Rangiferos (c). By (c) That is, this Kind of Creature is likewise subject to its Diseases which if they seize a Flock, goes through them all; concerning which Johannes Bureus, has it thus in his Papers; sometimes a sort of Disease after the manner of a Plague, affects the Rain Deer, so as they all dye, and the Laplander is forced to supply himself with new Rain Deer. (501) which we may see what we conjecture in our Case, is not meer Supposition, but certainly happens elsewhere to Animals of the like Kind.

But since we have an Instance of so destructive a Mortality among Beasts as quite to extinguish a whole Species at once, we may think some might have escaped the Common Calamity; but these being so few in Number, I imagine as the Country became peopled, and thickly inhabited; they were soon destroy'd, and kill'd like other Venison as well for the sake of Food as Mastery and Diversion. And indeed none of these Animals by reason of their Stupendious Bulk and Wide Spreading Horns could possibly lye sheltered long in any Place, but must be soon discovered, and being so conspicuous and heavy were the more easily pursued and taken by their numerous Hunters, in a Country all environed by the Sea: For had they been on the wide Continent they might have fared better, and secured themselves and their Race till this time, as well as others of the same Kind have done elsewhere. Of which more hereafter.

Or had those Barbarous Times been capable of taking Care for the Preservation of this stately Creature, our Country would not have entirely lost so singular and beautiful an Ornament: But this could not be expected from those savage Ages of the World, which certainly would not have spared the rest of the Deer Kind, Stags and Hinds, Bucks and Does, which we still have; but that these being of much smaller Size, could shelter and conceal themselves easier under the Covert of Woods and Mountains, so as to escape utter Destruction.

(502)

And here I cannot but observe, that the Red Deer in these our Days, is much more rare with us in Ireland, than it has been formerly, even in the Memory of Man: And tho’ I take it to be a Creature, naturally more peculiar to this Country then to England, yet unless there be some care taken to preserve it, I believe in process of time this Kind may be lost also, like the other sort we were now speaking of.

It remains we should say something concerning the Proper Name of this Animal, and what Species of Creature it was to which these stately Horns formerly belonged. And I must here needs own, that I have not met to this Day with any Person, that has spent the least serious thought concerning this matter. So destitute have we been in this Place of that inquisitive Genius, that in these later Ages has so much everywhere prevailed, in setting the Minds of Men upon a diligent search after, and making curious and useful Remarks, on all things that are truly the admirable Workmanship of Nature.

I know they are vulgarly call'd by ignorant People, nay, and some of the learned Vulgus in this Country, Elches Hornes; and that they are so, is an Opinion generally received, and satisfies such as talk of them Superficially, without further Enquiry; and because this is an Error that has so Universally prevailed, I shall take the more pains particularly to Confute it, and I hope clear this point so from all manner of doubt, that for the future there shall be no further questions made of it again; the mistake, I am satisfied, has only proceeded from hence, that we are in these parts as great Strangers to that sort of Animal call'd the Alche Elche, or Elende, as we are to this of our own (503) Country, knowing by hear-say only, that ’tis a large Beast with big Horns; but unless we shall give the same Name to Two Animals vastly different, which is Preposterous and breeds Confusion, we must not allow these Horns should any longer pass under the Name of Elches Horns.

I have seen a Pair of genuine Elches Horns brought out of Swedeland, and they differed extremely, both in Figure and Size, from these we have now described: they were abundantly smaller, quite of another shape and make, not Palmed or broad at the end farthest from the Head as Ours; but on the contrary, broader towards the Head, and growing still narrower towards the Tips end, the smaller Branches not issuing forth from both Edges of the Horns as in Ours, but growing along the upper Edge only, whilst the other Verge of the Horn was wholly plain without any Branches at all.

And accordingly the faithful Gesner, in the first Chapter of his Book De Quadrupedibus, has given us the right Description of them, where he expresses the Figure of the Elche and its Horns apart; and speaking of the Size of them, he says, Cornua singula Libras circiter Duodecem appendunt, longitudine fere duorum pedum (d). Whereas the Horns we find here in Ireland are near thrice that Length, and above double that Weight; though dry'd and much lighter from their being so long kept: But I confess, I say, this only by estimate, not having an opportunity to weigh exactly a single Horn by itself, though I'm sure I can't be much out.

(d) That is, each Horn weighs about Twelve Pounds, and was in length almost Two Foot. (504)

Moreover the Elche, as described by Apolonius Menabenus, who had seen many of them, is no larger than a midling Horse: these are areare his own Words, as quoted by Aldrovandus: Habet hoc Animal crassitiem & proceritatem mediocris & pinguis Equi (e). And agreeable to this is the Relation given in the Memoirs of the Parisian Anatomists, who dissected one of them: And I remember Mr. Duncombe, then one of the Lords Justices of Ireland, told me, when he was Envoy in Sweden, he had seen there above a Hundred Elches together in a Herd, and none of them above Five Foot high; and if so, we cannot imagine a Creature of that small Size, could possibly support so large and heavy a Head, with so wide and spreading a Pair of Horns as these we are speaking of; considering that exact Symetry, and due Proportion of Parts, Nature observes in the Formation of all the larger and perfecter sort of Animals.

We must then look out, and try if we can discover among the various Species of Quadrupeds, some other, whose Size and Description will better agree with this our Irish Animal than that of the Elche does: And after all our Inquiry, we certainly shan't discover any one that in all respects exactly answers it, save only that Lofty Horned Beast in the West-Indies, call'd, a Moose.

This Animal I find described by Mr. John Josselyn, among his New England Rarities in these Words: The Moose Deer, common in these Parts, is a very goodly Creature, some of them Twelve Foot high (in height, says another Author more particularly, From the Toe of the Fore foot to the Pitch of the Shoulder, Twelve Foot; in (e) That is, this Animal is about the Height and Thickness of a midling Horse. (505) its full growth much bigger than an Ox) with exceeding fair Horns with broad Palms, some of them Two Fathom or Twelve foot from the Tip of one Horn to the other. That is, Fourteen Inches wider than Ours was.

Another thus describes the Manner of the Indians Hunting this Creature: They commonly hunt the Moose, which is a kind of Deer, in the Winter, and run him down sometimes in half, otherwhile a whole Day, when the Ground is cover'd with Snow, which usually lyes here Four Foot deep; the Beast, very heavy, sinks every Step as he runs, breaking down Trees as big as a Man's Thigh with his Horns, at length they get up with't, and darting their Lances, wound it so, that the Creature walks heavily on, till tired and spent with loss of Blood, it sinks and falls like a ruin'd Building, making the Earth shake under it. Thus far what these Authors say of the Moose.

I do not know any one that has yet obliged the Publick by giving an exact Figure of this stately Creature, which would be acceptable to the Curious, and very well worth the while of some of those ingenious Inquirers that go into those Parts for the improvement of Natural History: for I take it next the Elephant, to be the most remarkable Quadruped for its largeness in the World. However, in the mean time, by the help of the foregoing Accounts, we may easily form to our selves a lively and just Idea of its Figure and Size; and if we compare the several Parts of those Discriptions, with the Beasts whose heads are found here in Ireland; we shall not have the least Reason to question but these vastly large Irish Deer and the American Moose, were certainly one and the same sort of Animal, being all of the Deer Kind, carrying the same sort of Palmed Horns, which are of the same Size and Largeness as well (506) as Figure; and Bulk of their Bodies corresponding exactly in Proportion to the wide spreading of their Horns; So that we may securely assert, that Mooses formerly were as frequent in this Country, as they have them still in the Northern Parts of the West Indies, New England, Virginia, Maryland, Canada or New France.

And least we may think this Animal peculiar to the Continent, and not to be found in Islands; I lately met with a remarkable Passage in John de Laet's French Description of the West Indies, that clearly shews the contrary; which, because it likewise illustrates and confirms what was said before, I'll set down in his own Words. Speaking of New England, says he; I'l y a une certaine sorte de Beste frequente en ces Pais que les sauvages noment Mose, de la grandur d'un Taureau, ayant la Teste d'un Dain, avec les cornes larges que muent tous les anns, le Col comme une cerf: il se trouve une grande quantite de ces animaux en une Isle pres de la Terre Ferme appelle des Anglois Mount Mansel. That is, There is a certain sort of Beast common in this Country, which the savage Indians call a Moose, as big as a Bull (he had not seen I suppose those of the largest Size) having the Head of a Buck, with broad Horns, which they cast every Year, and the Neck of a Deer: there are found also great Numbers of these Animals in an Island near the Continent call'd by the English, Mount Mansell.

This may give us reasonable grounds to believe, that as this Island of Mount Mansell must of necessity had some Communication with the Main Land of America, to have been thus plentifully stockt with this sort of Beast; so Ireland, for the same Reason, must in the many past Ages, long before the late Discovery of that New World, had some sort of Intercourse with it likewise, (though (507) 'tis not easy, I acknowledge, for us at present to explain how) for otherwise I do not see, how we can conceive this Country should be supply'd with this Creature, that for ought I can yet hear, is not to be found in all our Neighbourhood round about us, nay, perhaps in any other Part of Europe, Asia or Africa: And then 'tis certain as Ireland is the last or most Western part of the Old World; so 'tis nearest of any Country to the most Eastern Parts of the New-Canada, New-England, Virginia, &c. the great Tract of Land, and the only one I yet know, remarkable for plenty of the Moose-Deer.

And we may observe yet farther, That a sort of Alliance between these Countries of Ireland and the West Indies, appears likewise in other things, of which they partake both in common. For as they on the Coast of New-England and the Island Bermudas gather considerable Quantities of Amber-greese; so on the Western Coast of Ireland, along the Counties of Sligo, Mayo, Kerry and the Isles of Arran they frequently meet with large parcels of that precious Substance, so highly valued for its Perfume. In the Year 1691. Mr. Constantine an Apothecary of Dublin, shewed me one piece of Amber -greese found near Sligo, that weigh'd Fifty Two Ounces; he bought it for Twenty Pound, and sold it in London afterwards for above a Hundred. On the out-side 'twas of a close compact Substance, Blackish and shining like Pitch; but when it was cut the inside was more porous, and something of a Yellowish Colour, not so Grey, close and smooth as the cleanest and best sort of Amber; but like it, speckled with whitish Grains, and of a most fragrant Sent; I have still a Piece of it by me, that weighs above Six Drams, with several Samples of Three or Four other sorts of Amber, all found on that Coast of Ireland; some entirely black as Pitch, others (508) of a perfect White Substance, exactly answering the Descrption of that sort of Amber, Olaus Wormius mentions in his Musæum, Page 34. under the Name of Ambræ Grifeæ nondum maturæ.

Nor is the kind of Whale-Fish that's often taken in New-England, and affords the true Sperma Ceti a Strangger to the Coast of Ireland that respects America. This we may properly, I think, with Dr. Charleton, call the Cetus Dentatus, from its large, solid, white Teeth, fixt only in the lower Jaw; to distinguish it from that Species that gives the Whale Bone, most naturally named by Aristotle in his Historia Animalium Mysticetus, from its bearded, horny Laminæ in the Roof of its Mouth: of which kind likewise there have been Three or Four stranded in my time; but on the Eastern Coast of this Country that regards England.

This Cetus Dentatus is faithfully described by Carolus Clusius, in his Sixth Book of Exotics, Chapter the 17th, under the Name of Cete, aliud admirabile; and truly figured by John Stonus in his Historia Piscium, Table the 42d. and by Mr. Ray in his Ichthyographia, Table the 1st. but by both under the too general Name of the Balena. There have been Three of this Kind taken to my Knowledge, in the Space of Six Years, all on the Western Coast of this Country; one near Colerane, in the County of Antrim; another about Ship-harbour, in the County of Donnegall; and a Third in August, 1691. Seventy one Foot long, exceeding that described by Clusius, Nineteen Foot, towards where Bally-shannon, where Lough-Erne discharges its Waters into the Western Ocean.

And then it was, I had an Opportunity of truly informing my self what sort of Substance Sperma Ceti is, (509) and in what Part of the Whale 'tis found: concerning which Matter, Physicians and Naturalists have given the World such various and false accounts; and 'tis truly nothing else, but part of the Oyl or liquid Fat of this particular sort of Whale; which Oyl, at first when confused and mixt, shews it self like a Whitish Liquour, of the Consistence and Colour of Whey; but lay'd by in Vessels to settle; its parts by degrees separate, that which is lighter and swims a top, becomes a clear Oyl pellucid like Water, serviceable for all the uses of common Train-Oyl, got out of the Blubber of other Whales, and that which subsides, because 'tis heavier and of a closer Consistence, candies together at the Bottom, and is what is sold for Sperma Ceti, at Twelve Shillings the Pound; when 'tis throughly blanched and refined from all its filth and the remaining parts of the Oyl, that otherwise discolours it, and gives it a rancid offensive Sent. Of this Substance several Hundred Pound Weight may be gotten out of one Whale, but the cleansing and curing of it is troublesom, and requires no small Art, Time and Charge; which occasions the value of that which is througly refined: The Fat of the whole Body affords it, but that of the Head gives the greatest Quantity and purest Sperma Ceti.

I have some reason to believe to these Instances of the Moose Deer, Amber-greese and Sperma Ceti, of which Ireland partakes more than any other Country of Europe from its Neighbourhood with the Northern America, we may likewise add some of our more rare Spontaneous Plants, because they are found growing only in those Western Parts of Ireland, and no where else in this whole Country, or any of the Neighbouring Kingdoms about us.

(510)

I shall mention but Two or Three of many which I have been told are peculiar to those parts, because I am not yet well assur'd of the certainty of the others being so: and those are the Arbutus sive Unedo, or the Strawberry Tree; not to be found any where of Spontaneous Growth nearer than the most Southern Parts of France, Italy and Sicily; and there too, 'tis never known but as a Frutex or Shrub: whereas in the Rocky Parts of the County of Kerry about Loughlane, and in the Islands of the same Lough, where the People of the Country call it the Cane Apple, it flourishes naturally to that Degree, as to become a large tall Tree. Petrus Bellonius in his First Book of Observations, Chapter the 43d, takes notice, it does so in Mount Athos in Macedony; and Juba is quoted by Pliny in the Fifteenth Book of his Natural History, Chapter the 24th, as mentioning a thing extraordinary, for saying the Arbutus grows to a high Tree in Arabia; the Trunks of those in Ireland are frequently Four Foot and a half in Circumference, or Eighteen Inches in Diameter, and the Trees grows to about Nine or Ten Yards in Height; and in such plenty that they now cut them down, as the chief Fewel to melt and refine the Ore of the Silver and Lead Mine, lately discovered near the Castle of Ross, in the County of Kerry.

The other Plant I shall take Notice of is Cotyledon, sive Sedum serratum Latifolium Montanum guttato flore Parkinsoni & Raii, vulgarly call'd by the Gardners London Pride: I suppose because of its pretty elegant Flower; that viewed near at hand and examined closely, appears very beautiful, consisting of great Variety of Parts: The whole Plant is most accurately described by that profound Naturalist Mr. Ray, in his Historia Plantarum, Page 1046. where speaking of the Place (511) where it grows, he has these Words: Planta in Hortis nostris frequentissima est, ubi tamen Sponte oritur nobis Nondum constat, est autem proculdubio Montium incola (f). Though he knew no certain place where it grew Spontaneous, not having met with it in all his Travels; nor any Author mentioning its native Country, yet he rightly conjectures 'tis a Mountainous Plant, for it grows plentifully here with us in Ireland, on a Mountain call'd the Mangerton in Kerry, Six or Seven Miles over, and reputed the highest in Ireland, Two Miles from the Town of Killarny, and Four Miles from the Castle of Ross: Here it spreads it self so abundantly, as to cover great part of the Mountain, and for as much as I understand, like the Arbutus, 'tis peculiar to this County alone.

Whether both the foregoing Plants are truly American, I cannot at present determine, but this I know, that Sabina Vulgaris, or Common Savin is mentioned by Mr. Josselyn, in the Book before quoted, as a Plant common on the Hills of New-England; and I have been assured by an Apothecary of this Town, that he has gathered Savin growing wild as a native Shrub in one of the Islands of Lough-Lane, in the County of Kerry; and if so, I have reason to believe, that hereafter farther Inquiry may add to these I have given, several other Examples of Things Natural and Common to that and this Country.

But to leave these Digressions and return to our Large Irish Deer, which well deserves we should affix to it some Characteristick Note or Proper Name, (f) That is, 'tis a Plant common in our Gardens; but where it grows naturally is not as yet known to us, but certainly 'tis an Inhabitant of the Mountains. (512) whereby it may stand ranged hereafter in its right Place in the History of Animals: since Nature her self seems by the Vast Magnitude and Stately Horns, she has given this Creature, to have singled it out as it were, and shewed it such regard, with a design to distinguish it remarkably from the common Herd of all other smaller Quadrupeds. Naturalists have rais'd much Dispute, what Beast it truly is, that has had the Name given it by some of them, of Animal Magnum; Dodonæus, Menabenus, and others, would have it the Elche; Scaliger would have it the Bisons of Pliny, whether 'twas one or t'other, or neither, I shan't determine; nor do I the least suspect that this our Animal was meant by it; however, for its goodly Size and lofty Stature, and to retain something of an Old Appellation, I think it may very well lay claim to it, and not improperly be call'd, Cervus Platyceros Altissimus; sive Animal Magnum Cornibus Palmatis, incolis Novæ Anglæ & Virginiæ, ubi frequens, Moose dictum.

Excerpts from Ornithology (1876) related to Sir Thomas Browne's and the Tradescants' collections Now because elegant and accurate Figures do much illustrate and facilitate the understanding of Descriptions, in order to the Engraving such Figures for this Work, Mr. Willughby made a Collection of as many Pictures drawn in colours by the life as he could procure. First, He purchased of one Leonard Baltner, a Fisherman of Strasburgh, a Volume containing the Pictures of all the Water-fowl frequenting the Rhene near that City, as also all the Fish and Water-Insects found there, drawn with great curiosity and exactness by an excellent hand. The which Fowl, Fishes, and Insects the said Baltner had himself taken, described, and at his own proper costs and charges caused to be drawn. Which curiosity is much to be admired and commended in a Person of his Condition and Education. For my part, I must needs acknowledge that I have received much light and information from the Work of this poor man, and have been thereby inabled to clear many difficulties, and rectifie some mistakes in Gesner.
Excerpts from Ornithology (1876) related to Sir Thomas Browne's and the Tradescants' collections CHAP. XIV. The Stone-Curlew: The Oedicnemus of Bellonius: Charadrius of Gesner, Aldrov. called at Rome, Curlotte.*
Excerpts from Ornithology (1876) related to Sir Thomas Browne's and the Tradescants' collections

The Charadrios of Gesner,* * The Charadrios of Gesner. which Aldrovand judges to be the same with our Oedic­nemus, is a foolish and stupid bird. Being shut up in any room, it walks up and down, sometimes in a round about a Pillar or any other thing for a long time, and if any block or impediment be in its way it will rather leap over it, than decline from the right way. * It winks not. *It shuts not its Eyes though you put your finger to them. It is ea­sily made tame, for when it is at liberty in the fields it is not much afraid of a man. It is a Water-fowl, and lives in fenny Meadows, or about Marshes. In houses also it catches Mice in the night time. I hear that it abounds in the Low Countries, that it wanders up and down in the night, and makes a noise like a Whistle, or Pipe.

Excerpts from Ornithology (1876) related to Sir Thomas Browne's and the Tradescants' collections

Gesner, and Aldrovand following him, from the relation of a certain English man, write, that they want hard feathers, being covered only with soft feathers, or a kind of down: Which is altogether false, they being furnished with sufficiently long Wings and Tail, and flying very swiftly. They say it is a foolish bird, and easily taken. We are told that they breed not only on the Calf of Man, but also on the Silly Islands. Notwithstanding they are sold so cheap, yet some years there is thirty pounds made of the young Puffins taken in the Calf of Man: Whence may be gathered what number of birds breed there.